CAJ | 학술논문

对于资本控制下的当代社会生产所呈现出的现实危机，卢卡奇用“可计算性”来概括，海德格尔则用“可订造性”来形容。二者话题与马克思的“异化”有相同之处，但也有本质区别。正是在这种本质区别中，更显示出马克思政治经济学批判对于如何摆脱当代社会发展危机，并使社会发展走向科学路径所具有的指导意义。也唯有在此意义基础上，才能正确认识当前中国社会发展出现的各种问题并找到科学解决的路径。
대우자본공제하적당대사회생산소정현출적현실위궤，로잡기용“가계산성”래개괄，해덕격이칙용“가정조성”래형용。이자화제여마극사적“이화”유상동지처，단야유본질구별。정시재저충본질구별중，경현시출마극사정치경제학비판대우여하파탈당대사회발전위궤，병사사회발전주향과학로경소구유적지도의의。야유유재차의의기출상，재능정학인식당전중국사회발전출현적각충문제병조도과학해결적로경。
The reality crisis of social production under the controt ot capl：at is cm~u p~, ability＂ by Lukacs and ＂bestellbarkeit＂ by Heidegger. These two topics have the similarity with Marx＇s alienation, but still essential differences. These essential differences better reflect the guidance significance of the critique of political economy to the solution to the crisis of contempo- rary social development and the route to scientific social development. Only on the basis of the significance, we can correctly face the problems in contemporary Chinese social development and find out the path to the scientific solution to these problems.