史学月刊
史學月刊
사학월간
Journal of Historical Science
2015年
6期
98~108
,共null页
《秦汉之际的政治思想与皇权主义》 制度思想史 制度实践 学术范式
《秦漢之際的政治思想與皇權主義》 製度思想史 製度實踐 學術範式
《진한지제적정치사상여황권주의》 제도사상사 제도실천 학술범식
Political Ideology and Imperial Power in the Transition from the Qin to the Han Dynasty; the history ofsystem ideology; operation of system; academic paradigm
雷戈《秦汉之际的政治思想与皇权主义》一书为中国古代政治思想史研究提供了一种新的研究范式。雷氏认为除传统研究范式外,可从制度与思想的互动中建构出政治思想的复杂脉络,这种由制度分析揭示出来的思想史可称作"制度思想史"。中国古代政治思想史研究不但需要分析思想家的理论建构,也需要对制度实践过程中的政治思想予以阐发,这正是制度思想史的必要性所在。而制度思想史"制度分析"和"技术分析"的提出,使得这种制度思想史研究成为可能。制度思想史的提出,不但使旧史料具有了新的价值,更使思想的阐发回到了历史现场,同时也为平庸时代思想史的撰写提供了一条新的路径。毫无疑问,该书为中国政治思想史研究提供了一个新的范式,值得我们深入发掘与探讨。
雷戈《秦漢之際的政治思想與皇權主義》一書為中國古代政治思想史研究提供瞭一種新的研究範式。雷氏認為除傳統研究範式外,可從製度與思想的互動中建構齣政治思想的複雜脈絡,這種由製度分析揭示齣來的思想史可稱作"製度思想史"。中國古代政治思想史研究不但需要分析思想傢的理論建構,也需要對製度實踐過程中的政治思想予以闡髮,這正是製度思想史的必要性所在。而製度思想史"製度分析"和"技術分析"的提齣,使得這種製度思想史研究成為可能。製度思想史的提齣,不但使舊史料具有瞭新的價值,更使思想的闡髮迴到瞭歷史現場,同時也為平庸時代思想史的撰寫提供瞭一條新的路徑。毫無疑問,該書為中國政治思想史研究提供瞭一箇新的範式,值得我們深入髮掘與探討。
뢰과《진한지제적정치사상여황권주의》일서위중국고대정치사상사연구제공료일충신적연구범식。뢰씨인위제전통연구범식외,가종제도여사상적호동중건구출정치사상적복잡맥락,저충유제도분석게시출래적사상사가칭작"제도사상사"。중국고대정치사상사연구불단수요분석사상가적이론건구,야수요대제도실천과정중적정치사상여이천발,저정시제도사상사적필요성소재。이제도사상사"제도분석"화"기술분석"적제출,사득저충제도사상사연구성위가능。제도사상사적제출,불단사구사료구유료신적개치,경사사상적천발회도료역사현장,동시야위평용시대사상사적찬사제공료일조신적로경。호무의문,해서위중국정치사상사연구제공료일개신적범식,치득아문심입발굴여탐토。
Lei Ge' s monograph Political Ideology and Imperial power in the Transition from Qin to Han Dynasty proposes us a new academic paradigm to study the history of Chinese ancient political and ideology. Apart from the traditional research methods,L el thinks that we can construct the complicated political and ideological contexts from the interaction of system and Ideology. This kind of ideological history which was revealed by the institutional analysis can be called the history of system ideology. The study of the history of Chinese ancient political and ideology not only need to analyze the thinkers' theoretical construction but also to interpret the ideas during the system operate, which is the necessity of the history of system ideology. The proposed of system analysis and technical analysis make the study of The history of system ideology possible. And the propose of the history of system ideology not only make the old materials have new value but also back to the historical scene while elucidating the thoughts. Meanwhile, it also give us a new way to write the mediocrity age's ideological history. No doubt, Political Ideology and Imperial Power in the Transition from the Qin to the Han Dynasity proposes us a new academic method to study the history of Chinese ancient political and ideology. Anyway, it is worthy of our deeper attention and further discussion.