CAJ | 학술논문

“非市场经济地位”是中国入世遗留的最后关键性问题。国内普遍认为中国“非市场经济地位”将于2016年自动到期。随着日期的临近，针对该问题的争论日趋激烈，一些欧关学者认为“非市场经济地位”并非自动终止，如提出非市场经济待遇适用的“举证责任倒置论”。本文认为2016年后“非市场经济地位”的法律适用应由“特别法”转向“一般法”，终止对中国的歧视性实践。尽管如此，国内仍有必要继续系统探究《加入协定书》第15条的合理解释，关注WTO对该问题最新的司法裁判；预判可能面临的争议，并从WTO立法和司法、跨国诉讼等层面探讨可能的应对路径。同时，任何真正的改革都应是市场取向的改革，中国应继续坚持市场化发展和改革的决心，使得争论不攻自破。
“비시장경제지위”시중국입세유류적최후관건성문제。국내보편인위중국“비시장경제지위”장우2016년자동도기。수착일기적림근，침대해문제적쟁론일추격렬，일사구관학자인위“비시장경제지위”병비자동종지，여제출비시장경제대우괄용적“거증책임도치론”。본문인위2016년후“비시장경제지위”적법률괄용응유“특별법”전향“일반법”，종지대중국적기시성실천。진관여차，국내잉유필요계속계통탐구《가입협정서》제15조적합리해석，관주WTO대해문제최신적사법재판；예판가능면림적쟁의，병종WTO입법화사법、과국소송등층면탐토가능적응대로경。동시，임하진정적개혁도응시시장취향적개혁，중국응계속견지시장화발전화개혁적결심，사득쟁론불공자파。
The ＂nonmarket economy status＂ is the final crucial issue creat- ed in the process of China＇ s accession to the WTO. China generally considers that the ＂nonmarket economy status＂ will expire automatically after 2016; how- ever, the debate is increasingly vigorous when the date comes. Some people ar- gue that the ＂nonmarket economy status＂ will not be automatically terminated, and propose the ＂shift of burden of proof＂ theory for the application of the nonmarket economy treatment. However, the article holds that the legal applica- tion of the nonmarket economy treatment should be changed from ＂special law＂ to ＂general law＂. China should study the reasonable interpretation of paragraph 15, and focus on the latest WTO cases involving this issue, and ex- plore the feasible paths from the international and domestic perspectives. Mean- while, any actual reform has to be market- oriented, and China has to continue to adhere to the market- oriented development and reform.