社会主义研究
社會主義研究
사회주의연구
Socialism Studies
2015年
3期
89~94
,共null页
文化治理 协商民主 公共领域 私人领域
文化治理 協商民主 公共領域 私人領域
문화치리 협상민주 공공영역 사인영역
Cultural Governance; Deliberative Democracy; Public Sphere; Private Sphere
文化建设作为中国特色现代化建设的重要内容,是提升国家软实力和维护公民文化权益的重要载体。协商民主作为我国民主政治的独特优势,在＂广泛多层制度化＂实践中,其＂平等＂＂包容＂的价值诉求、＂交往＂＂商谈＂的实践特质和＂批判＂＂整合＂的思维取向,契合了我国文化建设中＂多元治理＂的改革诉求和时代趋势。本文提出在打破＂全能政府＂和＂超级保姆＂的同时,构建＂政府—社会—市场＂三元文化治理主体格局,以保持三者权力结构与作用边界的动态平衡;并以协商民主的＂宪政体制＂框架、＂双轨制＂机制和＂公共理性＂原则为导向,以控制政府权力、培育社会组织、规范市场力量三大维度为切入点,界定各治理主体的外在权力作用边界和内在职责担当,最终实现＂强公共领域＂＂弱公共领域＂和＂私人领域＂之间的对话与互动,提升文化治理的整体管理效能。
文化建設作為中國特色現代化建設的重要內容,是提升國傢軟實力和維護公民文化權益的重要載體。協商民主作為我國民主政治的獨特優勢,在＂廣汎多層製度化＂實踐中,其＂平等＂＂包容＂的價值訴求、＂交往＂＂商談＂的實踐特質和＂批判＂＂整閤＂的思維取嚮,契閤瞭我國文化建設中＂多元治理＂的改革訴求和時代趨勢。本文提齣在打破＂全能政府＂和＂超級保姆＂的同時,構建＂政府—社會—市場＂三元文化治理主體格跼,以保持三者權力結構與作用邊界的動態平衡;併以協商民主的＂憲政體製＂框架、＂雙軌製＂機製和＂公共理性＂原則為導嚮,以控製政府權力、培育社會組織、規範市場力量三大維度為切入點,界定各治理主體的外在權力作用邊界和內在職責擔噹,最終實現＂彊公共領域＂＂弱公共領域＂和＂私人領域＂之間的對話與互動,提升文化治理的整體管理效能。
문화건설작위중국특색현대화건설적중요내용,시제승국가연실력화유호공민문화권익적중요재체。협상민주작위아국민주정치적독특우세,재＂엄범다층제도화＂실천중,기＂평등＂＂포용＂적개치소구、＂교왕＂＂상담＂적실천특질화＂비판＂＂정합＂적사유취향,계합료아국문화건설중＂다원치리＂적개혁소구화시대추세。본문제출재타파＂전능정부＂화＂초급보모＂적동시,구건＂정부—사회—시장＂삼원문화치리주체격국,이보지삼자권력결구여작용변계적동태평형;병이협상민주적＂헌정체제＂광가、＂쌍궤제＂궤제화＂공공이성＂원칙위도향,이공제정부권력、배육사회조직、규범시장역량삼대유도위절입점,계정각치리주체적외재권력작용변계화내재직책담당,최종실현＂강공공영역＂＂약공공영역＂화＂사인영역＂지간적대화여호동,제승문화치리적정체관리효능。
As an important part of modernization with Chinese characteristics, cultural construction is an important carrier to promote national soft power and protect the culture rights and interests of citizen. Deliberative democracy has the unique advantages of democracy in our country, including value pursuit of ＂equality＂ and ＂inclusivity＂, practice trait of ＂communication＂ and ＂negotiation＂, thinking orientation of ＂criticism＂ and ＂integration＂, which all fit the reform demands and trends of ＂multiple governance＂ in cultural construction when ＂extensive multi-institutionalization＂ practices in our country. Building the subject pattern of ＂government- society-market＂ in cultural governance and keeping the dynamic balance of power structure and function boundary of the three are required, at the time of breaking the ＂omnipotent government＂ and ＂super nanny＂. Taking ＂constitutional system＂ framework, ＂dual track＂ mechanism and ＂public reason＂ of deliberative democracy as the guide, we define the external power boundary and internal responsibility of subjects in governance through the breakthrough point of three dimensions of controlling the power of government, cultivating the social organization, and regulating the market forces, and then realize dialogue and interaction between ＂strong public＂, ＂weak public＂ and ＂private sphere＂, in order to improve the overall management effectiveness of cultural governance.
