北京大学学报:哲学社会科学版
北京大學學報:哲學社會科學版
북경대학학보:철학사회과학판
Journal of Peking University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
2015年
3期
139~146
,共null页
似与非似 本色与非本色 审美标准与功利标准
似與非似 本色與非本色 審美標準與功利標準
사여비사 본색여비본색 심미표준여공리표준
similarity and dissimilarity, distinctive and non-distinctive characteristics, aesthetic standard and utility standard
判断一首词之本色,或者非本色,其方法大致有二:一为标准的制定及义界的规限,看其似与非似。这是立论之本。二为题材的辨别及表现方法的抉择,看其所写是感觉、印象,还是思想、认识;是有理之理,还是无理之理;是赋笔白描,还是比兴寄托。这是言传方式的具体运用。前者偏向于主观上的感悟,后者则偏向于客观上的实证及体验。但这并非绝对。作为讲堂实录,仅是示例而已。所谓辨别与抉择,两两并列,仍须作两面观。同一作者,或者不同作者,比兴寄托,一样亦能作得当行出色。用审美标准看,最好的词应当就是本色词;而用功利标准看,非本色的词不一定就不是好的词。
判斷一首詞之本色,或者非本色,其方法大緻有二:一為標準的製定及義界的規限,看其似與非似。這是立論之本。二為題材的辨彆及錶現方法的抉擇,看其所寫是感覺、印象,還是思想、認識;是有理之理,還是無理之理;是賦筆白描,還是比興寄託。這是言傳方式的具體運用。前者偏嚮于主觀上的感悟,後者則偏嚮于客觀上的實證及體驗。但這併非絕對。作為講堂實錄,僅是示例而已。所謂辨彆與抉擇,兩兩併列,仍鬚作兩麵觀。同一作者,或者不同作者,比興寄託,一樣亦能作得噹行齣色。用審美標準看,最好的詞應噹就是本色詞;而用功利標準看,非本色的詞不一定就不是好的詞。
판단일수사지본색,혹자비본색,기방법대치유이:일위표준적제정급의계적규한,간기사여비사。저시립론지본。이위제재적변별급표현방법적결택,간기소사시감각、인상,환시사상、인식;시유리지리,환시무리지리;시부필백묘,환시비흥기탁。저시언전방식적구체운용。전자편향우주관상적감오,후자칙편향우객관상적실증급체험。단저병비절대。작위강당실록,부시시례이이。소위변별여결택,량량병렬,잉수작량면관。동일작자,혹자불동작자,비흥기탁,일양역능작득당행출색。용심미표준간,최호적사응당취시본색사;이용공리표준간,비본색적사불일정취불시호적사。
There are two ways to judge whether a Ci-poem is with distinctive characteristics or not. The first way is to set up a standard and draw a defining line to distinguish similarity from non-similarity. This is the principle of our discussion. The other way is to identify the theme and choose the way of expression, for the sake of judging whether what is written is the Ci-poet' s feeling and impression, or thought and cognition; whether the Ci-poet' s reason is rational or irrational; and whether the Ci-poet uses simple straightforward narration or metaphor and analogy. These are the concrete use of the way of expression. The former is inclined to subjective sensibility, while the latter is inclined to objective demonstration and experience. However, this is not absolutely true. According to the aesthetic standard, the best Ci-poem should be one with distinctive characteristics. But according to the utility standard, a Ci-poem with non-distinctive characteristics is not unnecessarily a good one.