海南大学学报:人文社会科学版
海南大學學報:人文社會科學版
해남대학학보:인문사회과학판
Humanities & Social Sciences Journal of Hainan University
2015年
3期
124~130
,共null页
调解 调解协议 民事合同 反悔权
調解 調解協議 民事閤同 反悔權
조해 조해협의 민사합동 반회권
conciliation ; conciliation agreement; civil contract; right of rescission
调解的核心要素在于合意,基于双方当事人的意思自治而达成的调解协议仍具有民事合同的性质。调解协议的程序性效力主要是由其作为纠纷解决机制的组成部分而由国家立法所赋予的,将其从调解协议的效力中予以剥离,还原调解协议的民事合同属性,维持其作为合同的拘束力与效力,不仅有利于为当事人所享有的反悔权提供合体系性解释,也可以针对实践中强迫调解等现象发挥反制作用。调解协议的效力主要体现于其所具有的确定性拘束力以及确定力之上。前者是其作为民事合同的根本属性,而后者则为其所特有。一旦当事人达成调解协议,如果其效力无瑕疵,即应以协议内容作为确定当事人之间权利义务关系的根据,当事人也不得再以之此前的基础关系作为根据而为请求。
調解的覈心要素在于閤意,基于雙方噹事人的意思自治而達成的調解協議仍具有民事閤同的性質。調解協議的程序性效力主要是由其作為糾紛解決機製的組成部分而由國傢立法所賦予的,將其從調解協議的效力中予以剝離,還原調解協議的民事閤同屬性,維持其作為閤同的拘束力與效力,不僅有利于為噹事人所享有的反悔權提供閤體繫性解釋,也可以針對實踐中彊迫調解等現象髮揮反製作用。調解協議的效力主要體現于其所具有的確定性拘束力以及確定力之上。前者是其作為民事閤同的根本屬性,而後者則為其所特有。一旦噹事人達成調解協議,如果其效力無瑕疵,即應以協議內容作為確定噹事人之間權利義務關繫的根據,噹事人也不得再以之此前的基礎關繫作為根據而為請求。
조해적핵심요소재우합의,기우쌍방당사인적의사자치이체성적조해협의잉구유민사합동적성질。조해협의적정서성효력주요시유기작위규분해결궤제적조성부분이유국가입법소부여적,장기종조해협의적효력중여이박리,환원조해협의적민사합동속성,유지기작위합동적구속력여효력,불부유리우위당사인소향유적반회권제공합체계성해석,야가이침대실천중강박조해등현상발휘반제작용。조해협의적효력주요체현우기소구유적학정성구속력이급학정력지상。전자시기작위민사합동적근본속성,이후자칙위기소특유。일단당사인체성조해협의,여과기효력무하자,즉응이협의내용작위학정당사인지간권리의무관계적근거,당사인야불득재이지차전적기출관계작위근거이위청구。
Consensus is the core element of conciliation. The conciliation agreement based on the autonomy of both parties has still the nature of the civil contract. The procedural effectiveness of conciliation agreement is mainly endowed by the national legislation as part of the dispute settlement mechanism, and should be stripped from the effectiveness of conciliation agreement. Restoring the civil contract nature of conciliation agreement and maintaining its binding force and effectiveness as the contract is not only beneficial to explain the right of rescis- sion of parties concerned in a closed system, but also can play a role of countering such phenomena as the forced mediation in practice. The effectiveness of conciliation agreement is mainly embodied in its binding force of cer- tainty and the determining force. The former is its fundamental attribute as a civil contract while the latter is its uniqueness. Once the conciliation agreement is concluded between the defects, its content should be regarded as the basis of determining the tween the parties, and the parties are not allowed to make the request parties and its effectiveness has no any relationship of rights and obligations be- on the basis of the previous relationship.