CAJ | 학술논문

第三人撤销之诉程序有四种不同的类型，我国立法规定的是独立型第三人撤销之诉程序。在性质上，第三人撤销之诉既属于事前救济程序又属于事后救济程序。在审级利益的保护上，当事人之间存在不可避免的不对等，需要对相关救济程序进行特殊的设置以达到适度平衡的目的。第三人撤销之诉的制度目的和功能定位具有复合性，但应当突出其纠错功能、事后救济功能和实体救济功能。我国现行法对第三人撤销之诉的程序设置并不够完善，仍需要对其进行进一步的修改。
제삼인철소지소정서유사충불동적류형，아국입법규정적시독립형제삼인철소지소정서。재성질상，제삼인철소지소기속우사전구제정서우속우사후구제정서。재심급이익적보호상，당사인지간존재불가피면적불대등，수요대상관구제정서진행특수적설치이체도괄도평형적목적。제삼인철소지소적제도목적화공능정위구유복합성，단응당돌출기규착공능、사후구제공능화실체구제공능。아국현행법대제삼인철소지소적정서설치병불구완선，잉수요대기진행진일보적수개。
There are four different types of suit for the third party to revoke judgment. Under the Chinese Legislation, such suit is independent suit of the third party. In essence, it is the pre-action of aiding procedure and post-action of legal remedy procedure. As to the protection of interests at the case-hearing level, there inevitably exist discrepancies between plaintiff and defendant. Hence, we need to set up special relevant relief procedures in order to achieve a proper balance. The suit for the third party to revoke judgment is complex in its purposes and functions, but should be highlighted in its functions including correcting errors, afterwards relief and entity relief. In our current legislation, such suit still has inadequacies in procedures, and further modifications need to be made.