海派经济学
海派經濟學
해파경제학
Economics Study of Shanghai School
2015年
1期
1~11
,共null页
按劳分配 公平 效率 同向互促假说
按勞分配 公平 效率 同嚮互促假說
안로분배 공평 효솔 동향호촉가설
Mutual Promotion Fairness Efficiency
公平与效率的关系是一个具有重大理论价值和实践意义的命题。由于对公平的理解不同,学术界存在着多种对公平与效率关系的认识。主流观点认为,公平与效率是反向变化的关系。而程恩富教授则认为这种反向变化的看法是存在严重缺陷的。在程教授看来,市场经济下的按劳分配才是公平的真正含义。为此,他重新定义了公平范畴,将按劳分配思想引入公平定义,并从这一公平的含义出发,创造性地提出了按劳分配意义的公平与效率具有同向互促关系的命题。该命题的数理分析表明,在程教授的假设下公平与效率确实是等价的,因而程教授关于公平与效率存在同向互促关系的命题是成立的。
公平與效率的關繫是一箇具有重大理論價值和實踐意義的命題。由于對公平的理解不同,學術界存在著多種對公平與效率關繫的認識。主流觀點認為,公平與效率是反嚮變化的關繫。而程恩富教授則認為這種反嚮變化的看法是存在嚴重缺陷的。在程教授看來,市場經濟下的按勞分配纔是公平的真正含義。為此,他重新定義瞭公平範疇,將按勞分配思想引入公平定義,併從這一公平的含義齣髮,創造性地提齣瞭按勞分配意義的公平與效率具有同嚮互促關繫的命題。該命題的數理分析錶明,在程教授的假設下公平與效率確實是等價的,因而程教授關于公平與效率存在同嚮互促關繫的命題是成立的。
공평여효솔적관계시일개구유중대이론개치화실천의의적명제。유우대공평적리해불동,학술계존재착다충대공평여효솔관계적인식。주류관점인위,공평여효솔시반향변화적관계。이정은부교수칙인위저충반향변화적간법시존재엄중결함적。재정교수간래,시장경제하적안로분배재시공평적진정함의。위차,타중신정의료공평범주,장안로분배사상인입공평정의,병종저일공평적함의출발,창조성지제출료안로분배의의적공평여효솔구유동향호촉관계적명제。해명제적수리분석표명,재정교수적가설하공평여효솔학실시등개적,인이정교수관우공평여효솔존재동향호촉관계적명제시성립적。
The relationship between fairness and efficiency is one of the important theoretical and practical significance of the proposition. Due to the different definition of fair, there are many academic circles on the relationship between fairness and efficiency, while the mainstream view is equal to the per capita income as the basic definitions of fairness, it is the inevitable result of the reverse of fairness and efficiency. Professor Cheng Enfu thinks that the reverse change is not a law, but due to defects in the definition of the. To this end, he redefines the category of equity, and creatively put for ward the fairness and efficiency of the same to the mutual promoting relation proposition According to the definition of Professor Cheng, mathematical re lationship can establish the fair and the efficiency, the contact that, true equality is distribution according to work sense of fairness, because only the fair to promote the efficiency. In a word, fairness and efficiency are equivalent, so the professor Cheng of fairness and efficiency with the mutual promotion of proposition, is correct.