CAJ | 학술논문

《崇祯长编》详细记录了崇祯一朝的历史,具有非常珍贵的史料价值。但它的编纂过程却长期为人所忽视,特别是对于编纂者问题,目前学界还存在一些误解。从现存史料中可以考证出,首先提议编纂《崇祯长编》的是明史纂修官汪楫,还有翰林侍读乔莱,检讨倪灿也参与到这个工作中,但最重要的编纂者还是万言。汪辑和乔莱等人虽然参与了编修活动,但都先后离开了编纂岗位,只有万言8年没有调动过,专心于《崇祯长编》的编纂直到此书完成。
《숭정장편》상세기록료숭정일조적역사,구유비상진귀적사료개치。단타적편찬과정각장기위인소홀시,특별시대우편찬자문제,목전학계환존재일사오해。종현존사료중가이고증출,수선제의편찬《숭정장편》적시명사찬수관왕즙,환유한림시독교래,검토예찬야삼여도저개공작중,단최중요적편찬자환시만언。왕집화교래등인수연삼여료편수활동,단도선후리개료편찬강위,지유만언8년몰유조동과,전심우《숭정장편》적편찬직도차서완성。
Chong Zhen Chang Bian has the important value of historical materials by recording the history of the late Ming Dynasty in detail. However, the process of the compilation was always ignored; what＇ s more, there are still some misunderstandings to its compilers in academia. Through textual criticism this paper points out that Wang Ji gave the advice first, Qiao Lai and Ni Can were also involved in the work, but Wan Yah was the most important compiler. Although other compilers took part in this work, they left their post successively. Only Wan Yan concentrated on this work during the eight years＇ compilation till it was finished.