CAJ | 학술논문

“社会法庭”制度具有效益、自治和“接近正义”的现实合理性。但是“社会法庭”这一概念的提出，既有误解、难免误读，其置于全面推进依法治国战略的当下，法理依据仍显薄弱，难以解答“司法职业”与“社会自治”“严格司法”与“合乎情理”“程序正义”与“个案公平”“标本意义”与“推广价值”的逻辑悖论。研究认为，“社会法庭”在观念上并非一个科学稳妥的提法，应尽快将其纳入法院调解或者人民调解的制度框架，实务中注重发挥仲裁、律师代理和法律援助的积极作用，达到国家城镇化与法治现代化的和谐共进。
“사회법정”제도구유효익、자치화“접근정의”적현실합이성。단시“사회법정”저일개념적제출，기유오해、난면오독，기치우전면추진의법치국전략적당하，법리의거잉현박약，난이해답“사법직업”여“사회자치”“엄격사법”여“합호정리”“정서정의”여“개안공평”“표본의의”여“추엄개치”적라집패론。연구인위，“사회법정”재관념상병비일개과학은타적제법，응진쾌장기납입법원조해혹자인민조해적제도광가，실무중주중발휘중재、률사대리화법률원조적적겁작용，체도국가성진화여법치현대화적화해공진。
h is undeniable that the＂community tribunal＂ pilot system by the High court of Henan province is of realistic ration- ality in efficiency, self - governance and ＂access to justice＂. The concept of ＂community tribunal＂, however, may be misinterpre- ted and misunderstood. Nowadays, as the ＂rule by law＂ strategy is being comprehensively promoted,its legal basis seems to be weak, and it gives no solutions to the logical paradoxes between ＂judicial profession＂ and ＂community self- governance＂ ,＂ ab- solute justice＂ and ＂discretion＂,＂ procedural justice＂ and ＂case - to - case fairness＂, as well as between ＂exemplary signifi- cance＂ and ＂promotional value＂. This paper argues that ＂community tribunal＂ is not a scientific or well -advised concept, and should be incorporated into the institutional framework of court mediation or people＇s mediation. In practice, the positive effects of arbitration, attorney and legal aid be emphasized, to achieve harmony between the national urbanization and the modernization of law.