学术探索
學術探索
학술탐색
Academic Research
2015年
7期
63~69
,共null页
所有权保留 跨国破产 取回权 破产财产
所有權保留 跨國破產 取迴權 破產財產
소유권보류 과국파산 취회권 파산재산
retention of title; transnational insolvency ; recall fight; insolvent estate
作为跨国破产国际合作的重要成果,2000年《欧盟理事会破产程序规则》是世界上第一个较大范围内普遍适用的跨境破产规则,本文将以其为视角,分析跨国破产中所有权保留的效力问题。跨国破产中破产财产的范围不应包括所有权保留之标的物。尽管所有权保留与跨国破产的价值取向不同,但仍应以所有权保留之物的物之所在地法而非破产宣告国法确认跨国破产中所涉及的所有权保留条款的效力。在所有权保留买主破产的场合,买主对于是否继续履行合同享有选择权,卖主不能不加限制地取回保留物。在所有权保留卖主破产的场合,卖主不可以将保留物视为破产财产,径行行使取回权,能否继续履行合同的选择权应赋予买方。
作為跨國破產國際閤作的重要成果,2000年《歐盟理事會破產程序規則》是世界上第一箇較大範圍內普遍適用的跨境破產規則,本文將以其為視角,分析跨國破產中所有權保留的效力問題。跨國破產中破產財產的範圍不應包括所有權保留之標的物。儘管所有權保留與跨國破產的價值取嚮不同,但仍應以所有權保留之物的物之所在地法而非破產宣告國法確認跨國破產中所涉及的所有權保留條款的效力。在所有權保留買主破產的場閤,買主對于是否繼續履行閤同享有選擇權,賣主不能不加限製地取迴保留物。在所有權保留賣主破產的場閤,賣主不可以將保留物視為破產財產,徑行行使取迴權,能否繼續履行閤同的選擇權應賦予買方。
작위과국파산국제합작적중요성과,2000년《구맹리사회파산정서규칙》시세계상제일개교대범위내보편괄용적과경파산규칙,본문장이기위시각,분석과국파산중소유권보류적효력문제。과국파산중파산재산적범위불응포괄소유권보류지표적물。진관소유권보류여과국파산적개치취향불동,단잉응이소유권보류지물적물지소재지법이비파산선고국법학인과국파산중소섭급적소유권보류조관적효력。재소유권보류매주파산적장합,매주대우시부계속리행합동향유선택권,매주불능불가한제지취회보류물。재소유권보류매주파산적장합,매주불가이장보류물시위파산재산,경행행사취회권,능부계속리행합동적선택권응부여매방。
Under the background of economic globalization and with the increase of transnational investment and international trade,rapidly expanding are the numbers and scales of transnational corporations as well as transnational insolvency cases. Through these examples, it is not hard to find the creditors of retention of title are the larger proportion in all of the creditors. There are conflicts between the value of the priority fight to be repaid in the retention of title and the value of the equitable repay- ment of creditors in Bankruptcy Law. As the important results in the international cooperation of transnational insolvency, Europe- an Council issued The European Council Regulations on Insolvency Proceedings in 2000,which is also the first rules of transna- tional insolvency to be used in a wide range in the world. From the perspective of the regulations, this paper makes an analysis of the effect of retention of title in transnational insolvency. The insolvency estates can not include the object of retention of title. Al- though the value orientations between the retention of title and the transnational insolvency are different, the applicable law of the effect of retention of title in transnational insolvency is lex situs. When the buyer of the retention of title goes bankrupt,he may decide whether or not to continue to perform the contract. While when the seller of the retention of title does, the retention can not be considered as insolvency estates and the recall right of seller should be restricted.