CAJ | 학술논문

亚里士多德在《诗论》中对＂诗（ποíησιζ）＂与＂史（íστορíα）＂作了明确的区分,部分学者也常以此区分来断定或阐述希腊历史学地位的低下。笔者研究发现,《诗论》中的（íστορíα）并不是指普遍意义上的古代希腊历史学,而是指具体意义上的íστορíα,也就是希罗多德创作的历史学。从对象指属、相关内容等方面均可见出。
아리사다덕재《시론》중대＂시（ποíησιζ）＂여＂사（íστορíα）＂작료명학적구분,부분학자야상이차구분래단정혹천술희석역사학지위적저하。필자연구발현,《시론》중적（íστορíα）병불시지보편의의상적고대희석역사학,이시지구체의의상적íστορíα,야취시희라다덕창작적역사학。종대상지속、상관내용등방면균가견출。
Aristotle has made a clear distinction between the ＂ poem （ποíησιζ）＂ and the ＂ history （ltr1＂opict）＂ in the Poetics. On the basis of the comments, Some scholars tend to conclude that the history is of the low status in ancient Greek. However, I＇ ve found that the term ＂history （íστορíα）＂ in the Poetics does not mean the history of the ancient Greek on the common sense, it means the íστορíα in specific terms , namely the history of Herodotus＇ version. This article will reason in details in terms of the referring objects, its related con- tent and some other aspects.