现代法学
現代法學
현대법학
Modern Law Science
2015年
3期
123~136
,共null页
逮捕率影响因素 逮捕瑕疵指控式 审核机制
逮捕率影響因素 逮捕瑕疵指控式 審覈機製
체포솔영향인소 체포하자지공식 심핵궤제
impact factors of arrest rate;arrest with flaws;accused style check mechanism
新《刑事诉讼法》实施以来,逮捕率的下降趋势十分明显。据初步分析发现,逮捕数、逮捕率的下降与犯罪率的自然变化无关,相关逮捕制度和管理制度改革很可能是真正发挥作用的影响性因素。以C市为例的研究揭示,检察机关对逮捕瑕疵案件的考核控制的增强造成轻罪逮捕数量的急剧下降,这是导致逮捕数和逮捕率下降的关键性因素;由于指控式审核机制的作用,逮捕必要性审查对减少不当逮捕发挥了一定作用,但效果低于预期;至于"司法化"的审查逮捕程序,无论是讯问犯罪嫌疑人,还是听取辩护律师的意见,对逮捕决定的影响均较为有限。为了进一步控制不当逮捕,需要对现行的逮捕审查程序进行全面改革,逮捕审查应从采取指控式审核转向综合式评估,从行政化的准司法程序逐渐迈向控辩式的司法程序;与此同时,为了兼顾保障诉讼的价值目标,也有必要对轻罪案件羁押控制的策略做出重大调整,以全程性速审程序的构建取代行政考核管理。
新《刑事訴訟法》實施以來,逮捕率的下降趨勢十分明顯。據初步分析髮現,逮捕數、逮捕率的下降與犯罪率的自然變化無關,相關逮捕製度和管理製度改革很可能是真正髮揮作用的影響性因素。以C市為例的研究揭示,檢察機關對逮捕瑕疵案件的攷覈控製的增彊造成輕罪逮捕數量的急劇下降,這是導緻逮捕數和逮捕率下降的關鍵性因素;由于指控式審覈機製的作用,逮捕必要性審查對減少不噹逮捕髮揮瞭一定作用,但效果低于預期;至于"司法化"的審查逮捕程序,無論是訊問犯罪嫌疑人,還是聽取辯護律師的意見,對逮捕決定的影響均較為有限。為瞭進一步控製不噹逮捕,需要對現行的逮捕審查程序進行全麵改革,逮捕審查應從採取指控式審覈轉嚮綜閤式評估,從行政化的準司法程序逐漸邁嚮控辯式的司法程序;與此同時,為瞭兼顧保障訴訟的價值目標,也有必要對輕罪案件羈押控製的策略做齣重大調整,以全程性速審程序的構建取代行政攷覈管理。
신《형사소송법》실시이래,체포솔적하강추세십분명현。거초보분석발현,체포수、체포솔적하강여범죄솔적자연변화무관,상관체포제도화관리제도개혁흔가능시진정발휘작용적영향성인소。이C시위례적연구게시,검찰궤관대체포하자안건적고핵공제적증강조성경죄체포수량적급극하강,저시도치체포수화체포솔하강적관건성인소;유우지공식심핵궤제적작용,체포필요성심사대감소불당체포발휘료일정작용,단효과저우예기;지우"사법화"적심사체포정서,무론시신문범죄혐의인,환시은취변호률사적의견,대체포결정적영향균교위유한。위료진일보공제불당체포,수요대현행적체포심사정서진행전면개혁,체포심사응종채취지공식심핵전향종합식평고,종행정화적준사법정서축점매향공변식적사법정서;여차동시,위료겸고보장소송적개치목표,야유필요대경죄안건기압공제적책략주출중대조정,이전정성속심정서적구건취대행정고핵관리。
The arrest rate has declined obviously in China since the implementation of new Criminal Procedure Law. It is found through preliminary analysis that the decrease of arrest and arrest rate is unrelated to natural changes of crime rate,and relative reform of arrest system and management system are probably real impact factors. The case study of C City indicates that the enhancement of check and control on arrest cases with flaws results in a sharp decline in arrest of misdemeanor cases,which is the key factor leading to the decline in arrest and arrest rates. Due to accused style check mechanism,the review of arrest necessity plays a role in reducing undue arrest,but the role is less than expected. The "judicial"arrest review procedure including interrogation of criminal suspects and considering the views of defense lawyers has relatively limited impacts on the decision on arrest. To further control improper arrest,it needs to reform comprehensively the existing arrest review procedure. The review of arrest should change from accused style check mechanism to comprehensive evaluation mechanism,and gradually from administrative quasi-judicial procedure towards adversarial judicial procedure.Meanwhile,considering the value target of litigation protection,it is also necessary to make major adjustments of strategies of detain control on misdemeanor cases and replace administrative assessment management with speed-trial procedure in entire process.