CAJ | 학술논문

我国《涉外民事关系法律适用法》在部分涉外关系的法律适用方面要求选择＂有利于保护＂某一方当事人的实体法。这种规定虽然有体现冲突法实质正义追求的积极意义,但也为法院查明和准确适用外国法增加了难度,不利于司法任务的简单化。所谓＂有利的法＂,要求法院在众多可适用的法中,通过比较选择一个能最好保护一方当事人利益的实体法,这其实是美国＂最好的法＂选法方法的翻版。冲突法实质正义的趋向应当是有限度的,不应取代实体法所应发挥的作用,否则会破坏法律选择的稳定性和可预见性,丧失冲突法的规范价值和存在意义。鉴于该法生效时间不长,一时难以修改,可以考虑通过司法解释对之予以适当矫正。
아국《섭외민사관계법률괄용법》재부분섭외관계적법률괄용방면요구선택＂유리우보호＂모일방당사인적실체법。저충규정수연유체현충돌법실질정의추구적적겁의의,단야위법원사명화준학괄용외국법증가료난도,불리우사법임무적간단화。소위＂유리적법＂,요구법원재음다가괄용적법중,통과비교선택일개능최호보호일방당사인이익적실체법,저기실시미국＂최호적법＂선법방법적번판。충돌법실질정의적추향응당시유한도적,불응취대실체법소응발휘적작용,부칙회파배법률선택적은정성화가예견성,상실충돌법적규범개치화존재의의。감우해법생효시간불장,일시난이수개,가이고필통과사법해석대지여이괄당교정。
The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People’s Republic of China enacted in 2010 requires application of the most beneficial substantive law in some foreign relationships. Though this may be positive to realize the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws,it also adds obstacle for the court to ascertain and accurately apply foreign law,which is not beneficial for the simplification of judicial tasks. The beneficial law approach is a reproduction of American best law theory which requires judges to compare the different results of foreign substantive laws. We should bear in mind that the trend of substantive justice of conflict of laws should be limited in a scope and not replace the role of substantive law. Otherwise,conflict of laws will lose its stability and predictability and at last lose its value of rule. Considering that it has been enacted not long,the Supreme Court should rectify it by judicial interpretation at present.