改革
改革
개혁
Reform
2015年
6期
34~42
,共null页
政府效能 行政审批制度 政府治理能力
政府效能 行政審批製度 政府治理能力
정부효능 행정심비제도 정부치리능력
government effectiveness, administrative examination and approval system, capacity of government governance
对9个不同层级典型样本的网络新闻文本关键词频统计与文本的分析表明,我国行政审批制度改革具有显著的审批效率取向与政府主导色彩,作为一种多重现实条件约束下的理性选择,它着眼于政府与市场关系调整,既改善了政府绩效又释放了市场活力。然而,这一理性选择在新时期潜藏着“效率陷阱”风险,难以回应各种新的治理挑战,不能为实现“中国梦”、跨越“中等收入陷阱”、全面建成小康社会所需的国家能力奠定基石。进一步分析典型样本的相关新闻文本,发现我国行政审批制度改革在2010年前后出现转折,它标志着我国行政审批制度演进方向与路径是从“政府绩效”向“政府治理能力”转化。
對9箇不同層級典型樣本的網絡新聞文本關鍵詞頻統計與文本的分析錶明,我國行政審批製度改革具有顯著的審批效率取嚮與政府主導色綵,作為一種多重現實條件約束下的理性選擇,它著眼于政府與市場關繫調整,既改善瞭政府績效又釋放瞭市場活力。然而,這一理性選擇在新時期潛藏著“效率陷阱”風險,難以迴應各種新的治理挑戰,不能為實現“中國夢”、跨越“中等收入陷阱”、全麵建成小康社會所需的國傢能力奠定基石。進一步分析典型樣本的相關新聞文本,髮現我國行政審批製度改革在2010年前後齣現轉摺,它標誌著我國行政審批製度縯進方嚮與路徑是從“政府績效”嚮“政府治理能力”轉化。
대9개불동층급전형양본적망락신문문본관건사빈통계여문본적분석표명,아국행정심비제도개혁구유현저적심비효솔취향여정부주도색채,작위일충다중현실조건약속하적이성선택,타착안우정부여시장관계조정,기개선료정부적효우석방료시장활력。연이,저일이성선택재신시기잠장착“효솔함정”풍험,난이회응각충신적치리도전,불능위실현“중국몽”、과월“중등수입함정”、전면건성소강사회소수적국가능력전정기석。진일보분석전형양본적상관신문문본,발현아국행정심비제도개혁재2010년전후출현전절,타표지착아국행정심비제도연진방향여로경시종“정부적효”향“정부치리능력”전화。
The frequency analysis of network-news reports about nine samples of China＇s Administrative Examination and Approval System （CAEAS） reform reveals that the unique evolutionary characteristics of CAEAS are efficiency oriented, government led and top-down. As a rational choice under multiple constraints, the CAEAS reform that focused on regulating the relationship between government and market has improved administrative efficiency and liberated the market. However, there is a hidden risk of efficiency-trap in new era for the rational choice that is unable to deal with new governance challenges, and the cornerstone of national capabilities to achieve the Dream of China, to surpass the Middle-Income-Trap and to build a well-off society comprehensively is therefore difficult to be established. Further analysis of typical samples news texts finds that the evolution track emerges some type of transition from efficiency to ability around 2010, which means the evolution direction and route of CAEAS converts from administrative efficiency to capacity of government governance.
