CAJ | 학술논문

科技的发达、专业的细化使得诉讼中对于专业性问题的涉及越来越趋向多元化，凭借专家证人制度，英美法系国家对此做出成功的应对，属于英美法系国家的加拿大，在美国的既定规则的指引下，经多年的努力，确立了意见规则的相关性、必要性、无排除事项、可靠性等标准。在此过程中，法官所需、专家独立、无污染意见的内容与形式等要求则是附加于意见规则的程序保障。
과기적발체、전업적세화사득소송중대우전업성문제적섭급월래월추향다원화，빙차전가증인제도，영미법계국가대차주출성공적응대，속우영미법계국가적가나대，재미국적기정규칙적지인하，경다년적노력，학립료의견규칙적상관성、필요성、무배제사항、가고성등표준。재차과정중，법관소수、전가독립、무오염의견적내용여형식등요구칙시부가우의견규칙적정서보장。
The scientific development and professional refinement of technology make specialized issues involving litigation more diversified . By virtue of the expert witness system, common law countries have made successful response, one of common law countries, Canada ,under the guidance of the established rules of the United States, after years of efforts established the standards fo relevance, necessity, no exclusions, reliability. In this process, the need for judges, independent expert and non-polluted advice in content and form are the safeguards attached to the views of the rule.