科技进步与对策
科技進步與對策
과기진보여대책
Science & Technology Progress and Policy
2015年
13期
129~133
,共null页
外籍人士 科学技术奖励制度 法律制度
外籍人士 科學技術獎勵製度 法律製度
외적인사 과학기술장려제도 법률제도
Foreign National ; Sci-technology Tortation System ; Legal System
完善外籍人士科技奖励制度是全面深化对外科技交流工作的需要,是扩大科技奖励国际影响力的需要,更是我国科技事业发展的需要。虽然国家法律、行政法规、部门规章和地方性法规、规章等各层级,构成了外籍人士科技奖励制度的基本内容,但在奖励规模、评选规则和设奖主体等多个方面,已经不能适应国际科技合作与交流的需要。应当借鉴国外科技奖励制度的成功经验,提出完善我国外籍人士科技奖励制度的对策建议,包括在评选中强调科技成果的本土化应用,由重视项目奖励向重视人物奖励转化,推动社会力量发展国际性奖项,提高科技奖励规则质量等。
完善外籍人士科技獎勵製度是全麵深化對外科技交流工作的需要,是擴大科技獎勵國際影響力的需要,更是我國科技事業髮展的需要。雖然國傢法律、行政法規、部門規章和地方性法規、規章等各層級,構成瞭外籍人士科技獎勵製度的基本內容,但在獎勵規模、評選規則和設獎主體等多箇方麵,已經不能適應國際科技閤作與交流的需要。應噹藉鑒國外科技獎勵製度的成功經驗,提齣完善我國外籍人士科技獎勵製度的對策建議,包括在評選中彊調科技成果的本土化應用,由重視項目獎勵嚮重視人物獎勵轉化,推動社會力量髮展國際性獎項,提高科技獎勵規則質量等。
완선외적인사과기장려제도시전면심화대외과기교류공작적수요,시확대과기장려국제영향력적수요,경시아국과기사업발전적수요。수연국가법률、행정법규、부문규장화지방성법규、규장등각층급,구성료외적인사과기장려제도적기본내용,단재장려규모、평선규칙화설장주체등다개방면,이경불능괄응국제과기합작여교류적수요。응당차감국외과기장려제도적성공경험,제출완선아국외적인사과기장려제도적대책건의,포괄재평선중강조과기성과적본토화응용,유중시항목장려향중시인물장려전화,추동사회역량발전국제성장항,제고과기장려규칙질량등。
Improving and perfecting science and technology institution for foreign national is the requirement to entirely further international communication of science and technology, to expand international impact of science and technology award and to develop Chinese science and technology business. Although the fundamental institution content of scientific and technological award for foreign national consisted of laws, administrative regulations, department rules and local rules, it has already been unsuitable for the need of international cooperation and communication in some fields including award scale, evaluation rule, subject of establishing awards, and so on. Extraterritorial successful experiences of scientific and technological award system should be used for reference, and suggestions to improve Chinese award system should be proposed. Native application of scientific and technical achievements should be emphasized during deciding awards; emphasis should be transferred from project award to person award; international award should be developed by social organizations; quality of award rules should be improved.