外语教学
外語教學
외어교학
Foreign Language Education
2015年
4期
37~40
,共null页
小句复合体 复句 限定性 差异
小句複閤體 複句 限定性 差異
소구복합체 복구 한정성 차이
clause complex; Fuju; finiteness ; differences
小句复合体是系统功能语言学的核心概念之一。尽管它与汉语的复句概念貌似雷同,但是两者存在着本质差异。本文从限定性的视角探讨二者的差异,指出作为小句复合体构成成分的小句具有限定与非限定之分,而构成复句的分句却无限定性之别;英语中的大多小句复合体无法满足汉语复句的界定条件。
小句複閤體是繫統功能語言學的覈心概唸之一。儘管它與漢語的複句概唸貌似雷同,但是兩者存在著本質差異。本文從限定性的視角探討二者的差異,指齣作為小句複閤體構成成分的小句具有限定與非限定之分,而構成複句的分句卻無限定性之彆;英語中的大多小句複閤體無法滿足漢語複句的界定條件。
소구복합체시계통공능어언학적핵심개념지일。진관타여한어적복구개념모사뢰동,단시량자존재착본질차이。본문종한정성적시각탐토이자적차이,지출작위소구복합체구성성분적소구구유한정여비한정지분,이구성복구적분구각무한정성지별;영어중적대다소구복합체무법만족한어복구적계정조건。
The clause complex, a kernel concept in Systemic Functional Linguistics, shares some superficial similarities with Fuju, a concept in Chinese grammar. There exist essential differences between them, though. Adopting a finiteness perspec- tive, this paper addresses their differences and reveals that they are significantly different from each other in that clauses, as constituents in clause complexes, can be described as either finite or non-finite, whereas the constituents of Fuju cannot be so described ; and thus a large number of clause complexes fail to qualify as Fuju in Chinese.
