CAJ | 학술논문

“十七年文学”研究的重要性不言而喻，目前它却在整体上遭遇了一些困境。“现代性”和“历史化”是“十七年文学”研究中经常使用的观念，然而，前者在错位语境下的有效性边界问题，后者在实际操作中容易出现的某些局限，可能也是值得关注和商榷的。同时，无论在自由主义者还是在左翼学人那里，“个人”已经成为“十七年文学”研究范式和“知识”焦虑的一个严重症结。与此不同的是，“解殖民”视野因其同时注重历史感、过程性和知识“决断”等问题，呈现出特别的开放性与整合能力，或可为“十七年文学”研究打开新的空间。
“십칠년문학”연구적중요성불언이유，목전타각재정체상조우료일사곤경。“현대성”화“역사화”시“십칠년문학”연구중경상사용적관념，연이，전자재착위어경하적유효성변계문제，후자재실제조작중용역출현적모사국한，가능야시치득관주화상각적。동시，무론재자유주의자환시재좌익학인나리，“개인”이경성위“십칠년문학”연구범식화“지식”초필적일개엄중증결。여차불동적시，“해식민”시야인기동시주중역사감、과정성화지식“결단”등문제，정현출특별적개방성여정합능력，혹가위“십칠년문학”연구타개신적공간。
The importance of the studies of ＂Seventeen- year Literature＂ is obvious, but the studies currently en- counters some difficulties on the whole. ＂Modernity＂ and ＂historicization＂ are the general concepts used in the studies of ＂Seventeen -year Literature＂. However, the validity boundary of the former under the context of mis- placement and the limitations of the latter in practical operations are probably the problems worthy of attention and discussion as well. Meanwhile ,for both the liberalists and the left -wing scholars, ＂individual＂ has already become the crux of the research paradigm and the knowledge anxiety in the studies of ＂Seventeen -year Literature＂. By contrast,＂decolonization＂ has a different academic horizon because it displays special openness and integrity by emphasizing historical sense, process and knowledge ＂resolutions＂, etc. It may open some new space for the studies of ＂Seventeen - year Literature＂.