武汉体育学院学报
武漢體育學院學報
무한체육학원학보
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education
2015年
7期
5~13
,共null页
科学决策 体育智库 体育治理 现代化
科學決策 體育智庫 體育治理 現代化
과학결책 체육지고 체육치리 현대화
scientific decision-making; sport think tank; sport governance; modernization
采用文献资料法、历史比较法等方法,首先介绍了国际体育智库的状况,对全球独立自治型体育智库、半官方半独立型体育智库、附属型体育智库及其特征进行了描述。其次,根据我国现有体育科学咨询系统的实际情况,对官方综合型科研机构下属体育决策室(决策小组),体育科学研究所,体育学术团体、行业协会和研究论坛,高等院校及其相关研究中心(所)等五类中国体育智库建设的基本资源进行了梳理。再次,反思了我国体育科学研究机构中长期存在"受决策指导"而非"指导决策"的战略思想缺失问题,"上下梯"而非"旋转门"的科学咨询体制障碍问题,以及体育科研机构应有的全球视野缺失问题。最后,综合国际经验和国内实践,提出了拓宽社会市场多渠道捐助体系、注重海内外高层次人才引进、鼓励发展高校龙头型体育政策研究机构等建议。
採用文獻資料法、歷史比較法等方法,首先介紹瞭國際體育智庫的狀況,對全毬獨立自治型體育智庫、半官方半獨立型體育智庫、附屬型體育智庫及其特徵進行瞭描述。其次,根據我國現有體育科學咨詢繫統的實際情況,對官方綜閤型科研機構下屬體育決策室(決策小組),體育科學研究所,體育學術糰體、行業協會和研究論罈,高等院校及其相關研究中心(所)等五類中國體育智庫建設的基本資源進行瞭梳理。再次,反思瞭我國體育科學研究機構中長期存在"受決策指導"而非"指導決策"的戰略思想缺失問題,"上下梯"而非"鏇轉門"的科學咨詢體製障礙問題,以及體育科研機構應有的全毬視野缺失問題。最後,綜閤國際經驗和國內實踐,提齣瞭拓寬社會市場多渠道捐助體繫、註重海內外高層次人纔引進、鼓勵髮展高校龍頭型體育政策研究機構等建議。
채용문헌자료법、역사비교법등방법,수선개소료국제체육지고적상황,대전구독립자치형체육지고、반관방반독립형체육지고、부속형체육지고급기특정진행료묘술。기차,근거아국현유체육과학자순계통적실제정황,대관방종합형과연궤구하속체육결책실(결책소조),체육과학연구소,체육학술단체、행업협회화연구론단,고등원교급기상관연구중심(소)등오류중국체육지고건설적기본자원진행료소리。재차,반사료아국체육과학연구궤구중장기존재"수결책지도"이비"지도결책"적전략사상결실문제,"상하제"이비"선전문"적과학자순체제장애문제,이급체육과연궤구응유적전구시야결실문제。최후,종합국제경험화국내실천,제출료탁관사회시장다거도연조체계、주중해내외고층차인재인진、고려발전고교룡두형체육정책연구궤구등건의。
With sport reform becoming the "New Norm",urbanization developing rapidly,overall well-off society construction moving ahead and sport governance becoming more and more modernized,sports in China need to set a new sport thinktank,and to design modernization policy advisory mechanism to help the central and provincial sport institutions.Adopting literature review and historical comparison,this study introduced the status quo of international sport thinktank,including the global autonomous sport thinktank,semi-governmental sport thinktank and affiliated sport thinktank.Based on the actual situation of the sports science advisory system in China,resources of the affiliated sports integrated decisionroom of the official research institutes,the research institute of sports science,sports academic groups,industrial associations and research forums,universities and related research centers were analyzed.It showed that problems emerged because instead of guiding the policy making,institutions were guided by the governmental policies.The scientific advisory system was top-down instead of spiral.There was a lack of global perspective.In view of the problems,the social multichannel donation system should be broadened,high-level talent recruitment should be further reinforced,and encourage university top thinktank construction.