武汉体育学院学报
武漢體育學院學報
무한체육학원학보
Journal of Wuhan Institute of Physical Education
2015年
7期
40~45
,共null页
瑞士法 国际体育仲裁 国际体育仲裁院 国际商事仲裁
瑞士法 國際體育仲裁 國際體育仲裁院 國際商事仲裁
서사법 국제체육중재 국제체육중재원 국제상사중재
Swiss Law; international sports arbitration; CAS; international commercial arbitration
国际体育仲裁院在当今国际体育仲裁领域中占据主导地位。由于其所在地和裁决的仲裁地都位于瑞士,故实际运行深受瑞士法的影响。为实现仲裁结果对体育行业人员的公正,就仲裁程序问题而言,国际体育仲裁虽然属于瑞士法的仲裁,但瑞士法对国际体育仲裁院确立仲裁管辖权等程序性事项的态度较为宽容;就仲裁实体问题而言,瑞士法不仅在《体育仲裁法典》R45条、R58条以及国际体育组织章程中具有特殊地位,而且其实体强制规范根据《瑞士联邦国际私法》第18条存在直接适用的可能;就裁决的司法审查而言,一方面,瑞士法不希望过多干预国际体育仲裁正常的裁决,从而维护裁决的终局效力。另一方面,在例外的情况下保留撤销体育仲裁裁决的权力。
國際體育仲裁院在噹今國際體育仲裁領域中佔據主導地位。由于其所在地和裁決的仲裁地都位于瑞士,故實際運行深受瑞士法的影響。為實現仲裁結果對體育行業人員的公正,就仲裁程序問題而言,國際體育仲裁雖然屬于瑞士法的仲裁,但瑞士法對國際體育仲裁院確立仲裁管轄權等程序性事項的態度較為寬容;就仲裁實體問題而言,瑞士法不僅在《體育仲裁法典》R45條、R58條以及國際體育組織章程中具有特殊地位,而且其實體彊製規範根據《瑞士聯邦國際私法》第18條存在直接適用的可能;就裁決的司法審查而言,一方麵,瑞士法不希望過多榦預國際體育仲裁正常的裁決,從而維護裁決的終跼效力。另一方麵,在例外的情況下保留撤銷體育仲裁裁決的權力。
국제체육중재원재당금국제체육중재영역중점거주도지위。유우기소재지화재결적중재지도위우서사,고실제운행심수서사법적영향。위실현중재결과대체육행업인원적공정,취중재정서문제이언,국제체육중재수연속우서사법적중재,단서사법대국제체육중재원학립중재관할권등정서성사항적태도교위관용;취중재실체문제이언,서사법불부재《체육중재법전》R45조、R58조이급국제체육조직장정중구유특수지위,이차기실체강제규범근거《서사련방국제사법》제18조존재직접괄용적가능;취재결적사법심사이언,일방면,서사법불희망과다간예국제체육중재정상적재결,종이유호재결적종국효력。령일방면,재예외적정황하보류철소체육중재재결적권력。
The Court of Arbitration for Sport(CAS)holds a dominant position in the field of international sports arbitration.Since its domicile and place of arbitration are located in Switzerland,the operation of CAS is deeply influenced by the Swiss law.To fulfill the justice of arbitration of sports professionals,Swiss law holds a tolerant attitude towards CAS formalizing arbitration jurisdiction even though according to procedural issues of arbitration,the international sports arbitration belongs to the arbitration under the Swiss law.With regard to substantive issues of arbitration,Swiss law has a special status in the articles R45 and R58of Code of Sports-related Arbitration and the regulations of international sports organizations.Furthermore,based on Article 18 of Swiss Private International Law Act,substantive mandatory norms of Swiss law still have the opportunity of direct application.Moreover,according to the judicial review of awards,Swiss Law does not want to interfere too much with arbitration awards made by CAS so as to maintain the final validity of awards while it reserves the authority to vacate those sports arbitration awards in some exceptional circumstances.