西北师大学报:社会科学版
西北師大學報:社會科學版
서북사대학보:사회과학판
Journal of the Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
2015年
4期
122~131
,共null页
制度 制度质量 嵌入性 测度体系
製度 製度質量 嵌入性 測度體繫
제도 제도질량 감입성 측도체계
institution;institutional quality;embedded quality;quality measurement system
新制度经济学从制度的角度解释经济发展,具有较强的现实解释力度。沿用其分析框架,在回顾评述新制度经济学理论所涵盖的大部分制度和制度分类的基础上,依据嵌入性理论选择制度代理指标构建全球制度质量测度体系,从而使得制度质量理论研究和实证研究得到相互支撑。运用聚类分析和因子分析方法,研究2003-2013年间全球55个国家和地区的制度质量,发现全球55个国家和地区的制度质量既具有异质性又表现出同质性。聚类分析表明全球55个国家与地区的制度质量被分为八个聚类组,同组中国家和地区的制度质量具有相似性。因子分析结果则表明在近30个制度代理指标中,制度质量潜在因子仅有8项,说明影响制度质量差异的潜在因素来源于市场自由度、腐败控制力度、政府能力及相关时间成本等方面。
新製度經濟學從製度的角度解釋經濟髮展,具有較彊的現實解釋力度。沿用其分析框架,在迴顧評述新製度經濟學理論所涵蓋的大部分製度和製度分類的基礎上,依據嵌入性理論選擇製度代理指標構建全毬製度質量測度體繫,從而使得製度質量理論研究和實證研究得到相互支撐。運用聚類分析和因子分析方法,研究2003-2013年間全毬55箇國傢和地區的製度質量,髮現全毬55箇國傢和地區的製度質量既具有異質性又錶現齣同質性。聚類分析錶明全毬55箇國傢與地區的製度質量被分為八箇聚類組,同組中國傢和地區的製度質量具有相似性。因子分析結果則錶明在近30箇製度代理指標中,製度質量潛在因子僅有8項,說明影響製度質量差異的潛在因素來源于市場自由度、腐敗控製力度、政府能力及相關時間成本等方麵。
신제도경제학종제도적각도해석경제발전,구유교강적현실해석력도。연용기분석광가,재회고평술신제도경제학이론소함개적대부분제도화제도분류적기출상,의거감입성이론선택제도대리지표구건전구제도질량측도체계,종이사득제도질량이론연구화실증연구득도상호지탱。운용취류분석화인자분석방법,연구2003-2013년간전구55개국가화지구적제도질량,발현전구55개국가화지구적제도질량기구유이질성우표현출동질성。취류분석표명전구55개국가여지구적제도질량피분위팔개취류조,동조중국가화지구적제도질량구유상사성。인자분석결과칙표명재근30개제도대리지표중,제도질량잠재인자부유8항,설명영향제도질량차이적잠재인소래원우시장자유도、부패공제력도、정부능력급상관시간성본등방면。
Based on reviewing the comments of most new institutional economic theories and the classification of institutions , this paper attempts to find a measurement system , and defines the Global Quality Measurement System which makes the theoretical institutional quality related to empirical research . Under the system , this paper measures and compares the institutional qualities of 57 countries and areas in the world from 2003 to 2003 .Factor analysis shows institutional qualities of 57 countries and areas have the differences and similarity . Clustering analysis show s the institutional quality in 57 countries and areas were divided into eight cluster groups . Second , the results show that the nearly 30 indexes have only eight potential institutional quality factors :freedom factor , government regulation , rights and government financial ability , market adjustment ability , the government public service efficiency , rules of time cost , level of corruption , w hich tells the institution of quality difference comes from the market freedom , control of corruption , government ability and its associated time cost and so on .