CAJ | 학술논문

伴随全球化带来的治理风险以及国家治理能力现代化方案的提出,治理走向善治生态成为理论和实践的必然。善治生态范畴的提出是对传统治理模式作出的积极反应,是国家治理和社会运行自我保护的理性应对,是对作为治理方式进行的反思性创新。善治生态以善治正当性、整体关联性、动态平衡性和限制因子性为基本特质。善治生态稳健运行的前提在于其有合理的运行结构,国家与社会的互动、美德与政治的互渗、法治与德治的互为是善治生态的重要结构。由于善治见证了底层社会的生长现实和逻辑,因而善治生态的实现要以底层作为考察视角。同时,善治生态要以政府的反思性为重要关注,并在此种关注中呈现批判性维度。最后,善治生态要在政治文化场中共同推进,即要在善治本身遭遇的社会框架内找寻到一个可以和善治文化相衔接的承接点的同时,避免文化偏见,以先进的文化引领善治生态建设。
반수전구화대래적치리풍험이급국가치리능력현대화방안적제출,치리주향선치생태성위이론화실천적필연。선치생태범주적제출시대전통치리모식작출적적겁반응,시국가치리화사회운행자아보호적이성응대,시대작위치리방식진행적반사성창신。선치생태이선치정당성、정체관련성、동태평형성화한제인자성위기본특질。선치생태은건운행적전제재우기유합리적운행결구,국가여사회적호동、미덕여정치적호삼、법치여덕치적호위시선치생태적중요결구。유우선치견증료저층사회적생장현실화라집,인이선치생태적실현요이저층작위고찰시각。동시,선치생태요이정부적반사성위중요관주,병재차충관주중정현비판성유도。최후,선치생태요재정치문화장중공동추진,즉요재선치본신조우적사회광가내조심도일개가이화선치문화상함접적승접점적동시,피면문화편견,이선진적문화인령선치생태건설。
Due to the governance risk caused by globalization and modernization, the change from governance to effective ecological governance becomes inevitable both in theory and practice. The raising of effective ecological governance is a positive response to the traditional governance model, a rational handling to the self - protection of national governance and social operation, and a reflective innovation of governance pattern. Effective ecological governance holds the following basic characteristics ： effective governance legitimacy, overall relevance, dynamic balance and constraining factors. The premise of sound operation of effective ecological governance lies in its reasonable operating structure, while the interaction between sate and society, mutual infiltration of virtue and politics and the mutual functioning between rule of law and rule of virtue are its major structures. Because effective governance witnesses the growing reality and logic of the bottom, its implementation should be achieved from the bottom. Meanwhile, effective ecological governance should take reflective government as a major concern in which a critical dimension should be presented. At last, effective ecological governance should be promoted together with political culture which means finding a linking point with effective governance culture in the social framework it encounters, avoiding cultural bias and finally using advanced culture to lead effective governance construction.