CAJ | 학술논문

运用文献资料、访谈、录像分析等方法，对第十二届全运会跆拳道比赛中录像审议的典型案例进行分析。结果研究发现：跆拳道竞赛规则对旋转技术无认定标准；裁判员对双方同时犯规、犯规与得分先后和多技术审议进行不关联审议存在判罚难点；运动员与教练员存在审议申请配合难点。因此对临界旋转技术得分与不得分的录像审议应以“我方击头得分或对方击头无效”为申请内容；教练员应准确理解与把握双方运动员犯规行为的先后、主次、故意与否、是否获利的判罚依据；对犯规与得分先后的以犯规与攻击腿的起点和落点为判罚标准；针对一个以上技术的审议，教练员应根据赛况需要即时判断审议内容；审议申请以运动员的配合和提示为辅，形成默契配合。
운용문헌자료、방담、록상분석등방법，대제십이계전운회태권도비새중록상심의적전형안례진행분석。결과연구발현：태권도경새규칙대선전기술무인정표준；재판원대쌍방동시범규、범규여득분선후화다기술심의진행불관련심의존재판벌난점；운동원여교련원존재심의신청배합난점。인차대림계선전기술득분여불득분적록상심의응이“아방격두득분혹대방격두무효”위신청내용；교련원응준학리해여파악쌍방운동원범규행위적선후、주차、고의여부、시부획리적판벌의거；대범규여득분선후적이범규여공격퇴적기점화낙점위판벌표준；침대일개이상기술적심의，교련원응근거새황수요즉시판단심의내용；심의신청이운동원적배합화제시위보，형성묵계배합。
Depending on the methods of literature,interview and video analysis,the study analyzes the typical cases video replay deliberation of the 12th National Taekwondo Tournament. Results：the Taekwondo rule has no af-firmation criterion for rotation technology. The referee has judging difficulties in the case of double fouls,a foul and a score successively and unrelated deliberation through multi - technological means. There exists applying difficulty between Taekwondoers and coaches. Conclusion：the application of video reply deliberation for the critical rotation technology should be focused on the content of score by striking the head or the invalid opposite head strike. Coaches should correctly understand the sequence of two Taekwondoers’fouls to determine their primary and secondary factors,their purposes and profit factors. The case of foul and score successively should be based on the start and placement of the attacking legs. For multi - technological applying cases,the coaches should judge the applying contents timely upon the need of match. The research is conducive to improving Chi-nese coaches’instructing performance and their success ratio for applying as well as providing theoretic refer-ence for Chinese Taekwondoers performance in the world tournaments.