知识产权
知識產權
지식산권
Intellectual Property
2015年
7期
21~28
,共null页
知识产权 惩罚性赔偿 法定赔偿 《商标法》第63条
知識產權 懲罰性賠償 法定賠償 《商標法》第63條
지식산권 징벌성배상 법정배상 《상표법》제63조
intellectual property; punitive damages; statutory damages; article 63 of Trademark Law
随着修改后的商标法正式确立相关规则，知识产权侵权惩罚性赔偿的具体适用及其对司法实践的影响越来越受到关注。惩罚性赔偿应以故意侵权为适用条件，情节严重应理解为判断赔偿数额多少的条件。惩罚性赔偿与补偿性赔偿是倍比关系，《商标法》第63条规定的法定赔偿已具有惩罚性赔偿的性质，二者不可并用。法官在审判中不可主动适用惩罚性赔偿，但若原告笼统提出法定赔偿请求，法官也需进行惩罚性的审查。惩罚性理念的引入可望完善法定赔偿制度，为司法实践带来革新。
隨著脩改後的商標法正式確立相關規則，知識產權侵權懲罰性賠償的具體適用及其對司法實踐的影響越來越受到關註。懲罰性賠償應以故意侵權為適用條件，情節嚴重應理解為判斷賠償數額多少的條件。懲罰性賠償與補償性賠償是倍比關繫，《商標法》第63條規定的法定賠償已具有懲罰性賠償的性質，二者不可併用。法官在審判中不可主動適用懲罰性賠償，但若原告籠統提齣法定賠償請求，法官也需進行懲罰性的審查。懲罰性理唸的引入可望完善法定賠償製度，為司法實踐帶來革新。
수착수개후적상표법정식학립상관규칙，지식산권침권징벌성배상적구체괄용급기대사법실천적영향월래월수도관주。징벌성배상응이고의침권위괄용조건，정절엄중응리해위판단배상수액다소적조건。징벌성배상여보상성배상시배비관계，《상표법》제63조규정적법정배상이구유징벌성배상적성질，이자불가병용。법관재심판중불가주동괄용징벌성배상，단약원고롱통제출법정배상청구，법관야수진행징벌성적심사。징벌성이념적인입가망완선법정배상제도，위사법실천대래혁신。
With the establishment of associated regulations in the amendment of Trademark Law, there is an increasing interest in the judicial application of punitive damages for intellectual property infiSngement. Punitive damages are only applied when there is intentional tort so that gravity of the circumstances should be understood as the criteria of the amount of damages. Punitive damages are involved in the statutory damage of Art.63 of Trademark Law, which cannot be applied at the same time. Instead of applying punitive damages initiatively, judges should examine the punitive nature of damages awards when considering plaintiffs＇ requests for statutory damages. The introduction of punitive damages is expected to improve the statutory damages system, and will bring innovation to judicial practice.
