CAJ | 학술논문

《荀子》一书既有性恶的说法，也有性朴的说法。很多论者不注意后一种说法，而在注意到它的人之中，甚少有人认为它与性恶的说法是冲突的。日本学者免玉六郎别出心裁地以性朴论来解释《性恶》，而国内也有个别学者倾向于提出类似的解释。事实上，性朴与性恶是无法协调的。《性恶》无性朴的意思。我们在客观理解儒家人性论时要摆脱不正确的先入为主。荀子和董仲舒是性朴论的代表，而众多从王充开始先入为主的说法让人们不容易接受这一点。平心静气地读他们的原著，则可以发现以性恶论来说荀子，以情性阴阳论来说董仲舒是大有问题的。王充对董仲舒人性论的叙述难以在他的著作中获得支持。
《순자》일서기유성악적설법，야유성박적설법。흔다론자불주의후일충설법，이재주의도타적인지중，심소유인인위타여성악적설법시충돌적。일본학자면옥륙랑별출심재지이성박론래해석《성악》，이국내야유개별학자경향우제출유사적해석。사실상，성박여성악시무법협조적。《성악》무성박적의사。아문재객관리해유가인성론시요파탈불정학적선입위주。순자화동중서시성박론적대표，이음다종왕충개시선입위주적설법양인문불용역접수저일점。평심정기지독타문적원저，칙가이발현이성악론래설순자，이정성음양론래설동중서시대유문제적。왕충대동중서인성론적서술난이재타적저작중획득지지。
As for the discourses on human nature in Xurazi, there are two arguments on human nature, one stating that man＇s nature is evil, another stating that it is simple and uncarved. However, the second argument has been ignored, and for those who have noticed it, few consider that it conflicts with the first one. Rokuro Kodama, a Japanese scholar, creatively uses the second argument to study the chapter of Xunzi, ＂Man＇s Nature is Evil＂. Some Chinese scholars take this view. In fact, these two arguments on human nature are irreconcilable. Understanding Confucian theory of human nature, we should try to get rid of stereotypes. Besides, Xunzi and Dong Zhongshu are early two representatives of the doctrine of human nature as simple and uncarved, which has been hidden by the sayings from Wang Chong. With careful and peaceful reading of their works, we can find that it is questionable to label Xunzi a representative of the doctrine that human nature is originally evil, to label Dong Zhongshu a representative of the doctrine that man＇s original nature is good and man＇s feeling is evil. There is not evidence to support Wang Chong＇s ideas of Dong Zhongshu＇s theory of human nature.