CAJ | 학술논문

社会认知的内容存在两个基本维度，一个与热情或社会性特质有关，另一个与能力或智力性特质有关，称之为社会认知内容的“大二”模型。关于“大二”模型的理论有进化心理学、本体论和功能性三种解释。目前，“大二”模型的理论焦点集中在模型的文化普适性检验、两维度之间的关系以及两个维度的权重和偏好问题上。今后可结合本土实际情况围绕着三大焦点问题和两维度的具身研究等问题进行深入探讨。
사회인지적내용존재량개기본유도，일개여열정혹사회성특질유관，령일개여능력혹지력성특질유관，칭지위사회인지내용적“대이”모형。관우“대이”모형적이론유진화심이학、본체론화공능성삼충해석。목전，“대이”모형적이론초점집중재모형적문화보괄성검험、량유도지간적관계이급량개유도적권중화편호문제상。금후가결합본토실제정황위요착삼대초점문제화량유도적구신연구등문제진행심입탐토。
There are two fundamental content dimensions in social cognition, warmth and competence, which are also called “Big Two”. The first dimension is related to the goal of communion which emphasises the processing of social information relevant to warmth or social traits（e.g., helpful, honest）, the other dimension concerns the goal of agency which emphasises the processing of information relevant to competence or intellectual traits（e.g., clever, creative）.Why do we think these two dimensions basic？ The two dimensions, from an ontological viewpoint, are an adequate reflection of social reality. On the other hand, they are also functional to social perceivers. From the point of evolutionary psychology, people encounting others must judge the intentions of the other person or group, and their ability to act on those intentions.The concept of “Big Two” has been put forward for nearly a decade and has been widely accepted. However, its still in the stage of constructing, testing and further refining, so the researh mainly revolves around a few crucial questions. Firstly, is it generalizable for different cultures？ The names of two dimensions are still not unified, what’s more, researchers recently argued that moral may be a more important dimension than warmth. Secondly, what’s the relationship between the two fundamental dimensions？ They may be orthogonal, positive or negative related and each of them was supported by different evidences. Thirdly, which is the bigger one of “Big Two”？ Warmth generally is the more important and primary one in “Big Two”, but it can be moderated by the perceivers perspective and situations.Altogether, the research of “Big Two” still have a long way to go. Firstly, the study on “Big Two” in China should base on the local culture and use an more reasonable name, because Chinese emphasized that talents should combine ability with political integrity, but not warmth. Secondly, further researches be done on the three focus issues of “Big Two”. Thirdly, we should base future research about embodied cognition based on the two dimesions, because both of them are embodied abstractions in social cognitive processes.