CAJ | 학술논문

德勒兹一方面提出要＂回到＂马克思,另一方面又提出要＂遗忘＂马克思。＂回到＂与＂遗忘＂间的张力体现出的正是德勒兹对马克思深层次的继承。尽管德勒兹的精神分裂分析最终仍然类似于德里达的延异,使马克思所开启的社会批判边缘化、碎片化,但是德勒兹的思想涌动着的依然是改变现实的＂激愤＂。因而无论就文本还是社会实践,我们都能在德勒兹身上看到马克思的身影。也许正是因为＂遗忘＂掉那些已经固化的教条式的公式,才能避免我们把传统哲学根深蒂固的同一性诉求重又强加给马克思,才能真正回到那个在＂批判旧世界中发现新世界＂的马克思。
덕륵자일방면제출요＂회도＂마극사,령일방면우제출요＂유망＂마극사。＂회도＂여＂유망＂간적장력체현출적정시덕륵자대마극사심층차적계승。진관덕륵자적정신분렬분석최종잉연유사우덕리체적연이,사마극사소개계적사회비판변연화、쇄편화,단시덕륵자적사상용동착적의연시개변현실적＂격분＂。인이무론취문본환시사회실천,아문도능재덕륵자신상간도마극사적신영。야허정시인위＂유망＂도나사이경고화적교조식적공식,재능피면아문파전통철학근심체고적동일성소구중우강가급마극사,재능진정회도나개재＂비판구세계중발현신세계＂적마극사。
Deleuze proposed ＂return to＂ Marx on one hand,and on the other hand, he proposed ＂forget＂ Marx. The paper holds that the tension between ＂return to＂ and ＂forget＂ reflects the deep inheritance relationships of Deleuze to Marx. Although Deleuze＇s schizophrenia analysis is still similar to Derrida＇s differance,which made the social criticism initiated by Marx marginalized and fragmented, Deleuze＇s thought surges the ＂indignance＂ of changing the reality. Therefore, regardless of the text or social practice,we can see the shadow of Marx from Deleuze. Perhaps it＇s because we forget the formulas who have been cured and dogmatic,that we can avoid imposing the identity of the traditional philosophy on Marx again,that we can truly return to Marx who discovered the new world by criticizing the old one.