CAJ | 학술논문

罗兰·巴尔特对巴尔扎克短篇小说《萨拉辛》和爱伦·坡短篇小说《巴尔德马先生病案的真相》所做的多元阅读，是他从“符号学”阶段转向“文本性”阶段、从封闭的结构分析转向开放的文本分析的经典范例。这种基于五类意义代码的批评方法是巴尔特进行文学评估的手段，其中的“文化代码”和“象征代码”分别代表着作品价值标尺的两极。巴尔特对“代码”这一术语的反常使用，为他超越结构主义的文本观、转向后结构主义的互文观提供了可能。
라란·파이특대파이찰극단편소설《살랍신》화애륜·파단편소설《파이덕마선생병안적진상》소주적다원열독，시타종“부호학”계단전향“문본성”계단、종봉폐적결구분석전향개방적문본분석적경전범례。저충기우오류의의대마적비평방법시파이특진행문학평고적수단，기중적“문화대마”화“상정대마”분별대표착작품개치표척적량겁。파이특대“대마”저일술어적반상사용，위타초월결구주의적문본관、전향후결구주의적호문관제공료가능。
Roland Barthe’plural reading of Balzac＇s Sarrasine and Edgar Allan Poe‘s The Facts in the Case of M.Valdemar is a classic example confirming his transition from the “semiology”phase to that of “textuality”,or from structural analysis to textual analysis. This particular method of critique, based on five codes of meaning,is applied by Barthes to evaluating literary works. Thus the “cultural code”and the “symbolic code”represent respectively the two poles of his literary value scale. As for the notion of the code,it is used by Barthes in an unusual way that allows him to go beyond the struc-turalist view of text to the post-structuralist view of intertextuality.