中国人民大学学报
中國人民大學學報
중국인민대학학보
Journal of Renmin University of China
2015年
4期
129~136
,共null页
章学诚 经典观 六经 先王政典 后圣微言
章學誠 經典觀 六經 先王政典 後聖微言
장학성 경전관 육경 선왕정전 후골미언
Zhang Xuecheng;the view of what is Classics;the six Confucian Classics;the political nomos of the former kings;the esoteric words of the later sage
章学诚借由“文史校雠”提出了著名的“六经皆史”说。这一学说所表达的关于经典的性质和地位的理论往往被误解为简单地尊史抑经,甚或是为独立的现代史学张目。只有把“六经皆史”的断言和“周孔之教”的命题联系起来,我们才能理解章学诚在中国政教文明内部挑起这一争论的真正意义。与那些急于把中国学术与文史哲独立分科的康德式西学接枝的后学相反,章学诚恰恰要通过“辨章学术、考镜源流”的方式引领有识之士回到经史未分的古典时代,重新确立“周孔合一”的明道之志,以超越“道术为天下裂”的学术困局。
章學誠藉由“文史校讎”提齣瞭著名的“六經皆史”說。這一學說所錶達的關于經典的性質和地位的理論往往被誤解為簡單地尊史抑經,甚或是為獨立的現代史學張目。隻有把“六經皆史”的斷言和“週孔之教”的命題聯繫起來,我們纔能理解章學誠在中國政教文明內部挑起這一爭論的真正意義。與那些急于把中國學術與文史哲獨立分科的康德式西學接枝的後學相反,章學誠恰恰要通過“辨章學術、攷鏡源流”的方式引領有識之士迴到經史未分的古典時代,重新確立“週孔閤一”的明道之誌,以超越“道術為天下裂”的學術睏跼。
장학성차유“문사교수”제출료저명적“육경개사”설。저일학설소표체적관우경전적성질화지위적이론왕왕피오해위간단지존사억경,심혹시위독립적현대사학장목。지유파“육경개사”적단언화“주공지교”적명제련계기래,아문재능리해장학성재중국정교문명내부도기저일쟁론적진정의의。여나사급우파중국학술여문사철독립분과적강덕식서학접지적후학상반,장학성흡흡요통과“변장학술、고경원류”적방식인령유식지사회도경사미분적고전시대,중신학립“주공합일”적명도지지,이초월“도술위천하렬”적학술곤국。
Through collation of ancient and contemporary literature Zhang Xuecheng advanced the fa-mous proposition that “the six Confucian Classics are all history”. This proposition concentrates on the theory of what is Classics. If we accepted the popular understanding that the proposition claimed the independence of historiography,we would neglect the true intention of Zhang. By integrating the maxim and the theme that “Confucius is identified with Duke Zhou”into a whole,we can grasp why Zhang stirred up the controversy within Chinese culture. Instead of welcoming Kantian differentiation principle of modern science,Zhang hoped to lead us return to the Classical times when Classics and History had not alienated from a whole and surpass the difficulty that “Daoshu will be rent by the so-cial world”.
