CAJ | 학술논문

贝克的风险社会理论为法社会学重新审视现有的新型法律风险提供了理论依据。第三方值机软件遭到禁用，通过传统法学理论容易造成自由选择权与自由经营权上的逻辑悖论，在选择时容易产生更多的法律风险。而通过风险理论的法社会学分析，立法目的在于风险共担与利益共享，“共景监狱”式的法律监控模式以及软法规范的介入，这些法律评估工具的系统性修正有利于问题的解决，这也为我国实现良法与善治提出了更高的理论要求和实践任务。
패극적풍험사회이론위법사회학중신심시현유적신형법률풍험제공료이론의거。제삼방치궤연건조도금용，통과전통법학이론용역조성자유선택권여자유경영권상적라집패론，재선택시용역산생경다적법률풍험。이통과풍험이론적법사회학분석，입법목적재우풍험공담여이익공향，“공경감옥”식적법률감공모식이급연법규범적개입，저사법률평고공구적계통성수정유리우문제적해결，저야위아국실현량법여선치제출료경고적이론요구화실천임무。
Beck＇s risk society theory provides a theoretical basis for the sociology of law to re - examine current new legal risks. The third - party check - in software is prohibited. In the view of traditional law theory, there is logical paradox between freedom of choice and that of operation in this matter, and more legal risks are likely to arise in making the choice. However, the risk theory - based social - law study shows that the purpose of legislation lies in sharing of both risk and benefit. The systematic correction of the legal assessment tools, including the panopticon type of legal supervision mode and the intervention of soft law norms, can help solve the paradox. This also raises higher requirements in theory and practice for our country to achieve good law and good governance.