开放教育研究
開放教育研究
개방교육연구
Open Education Research
2015年
4期
81~88
,共null页
协作问题解决学习 认知负荷 教学支架 团体认知 基于设计的研究
協作問題解決學習 認知負荷 教學支架 糰體認知 基于設計的研究
협작문제해결학습 인지부하 교학지가 단체인지 기우설계적연구
collaborative problem solving ; cognitive load ; instruction intervention ; group cognition ; design-based re- search
在协作问题解决学习中,如何促使学习者个体认知得到有效发展,是本研究关注的核心。本研究运用基于设计的研究理念,以认知负荷理论作为教学设计的理论基础,从架构协作学习任务和支架团体认知的教学干预设计入手,设计了一个以“空气质量检测”为主题的协作问题解决学习项目。为了探究所设计的教学干预对个体认知发展和协作过程的影响,本研究对上海两所学校进行了整合教学干预和未整合教学干预的对比实验研究。研究发现,从学习结果的角度看,整合架构协作学习任务和支架团体认知的教学设计干预能在协作问题解决学习中有效促进个体认知的发展。从学习过程角度看,本研究设计的教学干预虽然对协作技能有积极作用,但是对团体认知发展没有体现出优势。这一研究发现能为课堂实践协作问题解决学习提供教学指导。
在協作問題解決學習中,如何促使學習者箇體認知得到有效髮展,是本研究關註的覈心。本研究運用基于設計的研究理唸,以認知負荷理論作為教學設計的理論基礎,從架構協作學習任務和支架糰體認知的教學榦預設計入手,設計瞭一箇以“空氣質量檢測”為主題的協作問題解決學習項目。為瞭探究所設計的教學榦預對箇體認知髮展和協作過程的影響,本研究對上海兩所學校進行瞭整閤教學榦預和未整閤教學榦預的對比實驗研究。研究髮現,從學習結果的角度看,整閤架構協作學習任務和支架糰體認知的教學設計榦預能在協作問題解決學習中有效促進箇體認知的髮展。從學習過程角度看,本研究設計的教學榦預雖然對協作技能有積極作用,但是對糰體認知髮展沒有體現齣優勢。這一研究髮現能為課堂實踐協作問題解決學習提供教學指導。
재협작문제해결학습중,여하촉사학습자개체인지득도유효발전,시본연구관주적핵심。본연구운용기우설계적연구이념,이인지부하이론작위교학설계적이론기출,종가구협작학습임무화지가단체인지적교학간예설계입수,설계료일개이“공기질량검측”위주제적협작문제해결학습항목。위료탐구소설계적교학간예대개체인지발전화협작과정적영향,본연구대상해량소학교진행료정합교학간예화미정합교학간예적대비실험연구。연구발현,종학습결과적각도간,정합가구협작학습임무화지가단체인지적교학설계간예능재협작문제해결학습중유효촉진개체인지적발전。종학습과정각도간,본연구설계적교학간예수연대협작기능유적겁작용,단시대단체인지발전몰유체현출우세。저일연구발현능위과당실천협작문제해결학습제공교학지도。
In order to facilitate and optimize students' learning outcomes, it is necessary to design interventions to support teachers ' instructions ( e. g. collaborative problem solving method). Moreover, our economic society requires student to be equipped with lifelong learning skills such as problem solving skills and collaboration skills in order for them to deal with uncertain problems in their future life. Therefore, key research question for this study is to design ap- propriate interventions for group members to engage them in active cognitive processes as well as to improve their cogni- tive and collaborative skills. This study describes an instructional intervention by structuring the collaborative tasks and scripting the group cognitive process based on the cognitive load theory. Specifically, when designing the collaborative problem solving activities, in terms of structuring the collaborative task, we select an ill-structured learning topic to control the intrinsic cognitive load in group learning and design the three connected parts of learning activities with two science teachers to decrease the extraneous cognitive load. We also use some worksheets to structure students ' explora- tion in a specific problem space to optimize the germane cognitive load. In terms of scripting the group cognitive process, we construct two parts of tralning sessions, that is, group talk and interesting qnestion for developing student ' s group awareness. In order to investigate the effect of the whole designed intervention for collaborative problem sol- ving, a comparison study is conducted in third Grade science class in two Shanghai elementary schools. Data was col- lected from Watson-Glaser^TM H critical thinking test from both the pre- and post- test results, and also from group in- terviews after the collaborative problem solving learning project. After analyzing the pre- and post- test data, we find that the designed intervention has a positive effect on individual learning outcome. This result shows that the idea of designed intervention is useful to support the instruction of collaborative problem solving in science classroom. Based on the independent sample t-test on group skill and group cognition, the study finds that the design intervention has posi- ment of group skills but not on the development of group cognition. That means that the inter- vention is useful to support the development of group skills, while changes should be made when using the intervention for group cognition. The result demonstrates that the strength of intervention in promoting group cognition applied in this study is not enough for developing individual cognition. In future studies, we need to focus more on designing herent intervention for group cognition in collaborative problems solving instruction. In this study, while we pay much attention to pedagogical intervention in collaborative problem solving, we do not employ technological support for struc- turing the complex learning process. In future research, we will combine pedagogical and technological supports to de- stgn more and detailed collaborative problem solving intervention.