CAJ | 학술논문

文章旨在研究社会文化因素对腐败程度的影响，以赫斯特德（Husted）和格拉埃夫（Graeff）的观点为出发点，分析了文化和社会资本与腐败之间的关系。研究结果显示，普遍信任（表现为连接性社会资本和桥接性社会资本）是一种积极的社会资本，与腐败程度呈负相关关系。与之相对，特殊信任（表现为粘合性社会资本）是一种消极的社会资本，与腐败程度呈正相关关系。此外，有些文化认为成员间彼此依赖合情合理，并为形成关系密切的特殊群体（与权力距离大、崇尚群体主义有关）提供有利环境，这种文化为产生违背道德准则的寻租行为提供了温床。
문장지재연구사회문화인소대부패정도적영향，이혁사특덕（Husted）화격랍애부（Graeff）적관점위출발점，분석료문화화사회자본여부패지간적관계。연구결과현시，보편신임（표현위련접성사회자본화교접성사회자본）시일충적겁적사회자본，여부패정도정부상관관계。여지상대，특수신임（표현위점합성사회자본）시일충소겁적사회자본，여부패정도정정상관관계。차외，유사문화인위성원간피차의뢰합정합리，병위형성관계밀절적특수군체（여권력거리대、숭상군체주의유관）제공유리배경，저충문화위산생위배도덕준칙적심조행위제공료온상。
The aim of this work is to analyze the influence of sociocuhural factors on corruption levels. Taking as starting point Husted （ J Int Bus Studies 30 ： 339 - 359, 1999 ） and Graeff （ In ： Lambsdorff J, Taube M, Schramm M （eds） The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. Routledge, London, 2005 ） proposals, we consider both the interrelation between cultural dimensions and the diverse expressions of social capital with cor- ruption. According to our results, the universalistic trust （linking and bridging social capital） constitutes a pos- itive social capital that is negatively linked to corruption. In contrast, the particularistic levels of trust （ bond- ing） can constitute a negative social capital directly related to corruption levels. Furthermore, cultures which are favourable to the legitimation of dependency relations and the formation of closed particularistic groups （ power - distance and community factor） create a breeding ground for the development of these amoral rent - seeking structures.