考古与文物
攷古與文物
고고여문물
Archaeology and Cultural Relics
2015年
4期
49~52
,共null页
屈子赤角簠 息公子朱 公子朱
屈子赤角簠 息公子硃 公子硃
굴자적각보 식공자주 공자주
Quzi Chiijao Fu; Xigong Zi Zhu; Gongzi Zhu(Prince Zhu)
楚系青铜器"屈子赤角簠"的作器者"屈子赤角",目前学界多认为其即《左传》记载的楚"息公子朱"。揆诸史籍及出土材料,该观点值得商榷。"息公子朱"当为"公子朱",其出身为王室公子,与"屈子赤角"应非一人。
楚繫青銅器"屈子赤角簠"的作器者"屈子赤角",目前學界多認為其即《左傳》記載的楚"息公子硃"。揆諸史籍及齣土材料,該觀點值得商榷。"息公子硃"噹為"公子硃",其齣身為王室公子,與"屈子赤角"應非一人。
초계청동기"굴자적각보"적작기자"굴자적각",목전학계다인위기즉《좌전》기재적초"식공자주"。규제사적급출토재료,해관점치득상각。"식공자주"당위"공자주",기출신위왕실공자,여"굴자적각"응비일인。
In recent scholarship,the donor of the Quzi Chijiaofu,an important piece of Chu bronze,was considered as Xigong Zi Zhu mentioned in Zuo Zhuan. The author argues that this conventional view contradicts with other lines of evidence mentioned in transmitted texts and unearthed records. Instead,the author suggests ‘Xigong Zi Zhu'should be read as‘Gong Zi Zhu',or the prince Zhu,who belonged to the royal family of the Chu State. In other words,‘Quzi Chijiao'could not be the same individual of ‘Gong Zi Zhu'.