CAJ | 학술논문

集体经营性建设用地流转所面临的法律困境主要表现在：集体经营性建设用地“使用权”未获正名；集体经营性建设用地使用权流转未得到一般性承认；“小产权房”屡禁不绝，行政、司法无能为力。集体经营性建设用地流转的制度障碍，源于《宪法》第10条“城市土地属于国家所有”之规定及其体系效应。为了实现集体经营性建设用地“同等入市”的改革目标，应在总结地方改革试点经验的基础上实行法制革新，包括：明确“集体建设用地使用权”的用益物权地位；排除集体经营性建设用地（使用权）流转的宪法和法律障碍；构建集体经营性建设用地使用权流转的规则体系；完善集体经营性建设用地使用权流转的配套制度。
집체경영성건설용지류전소면림적법률곤경주요표현재：집체경영성건설용지“사용권”미획정명；집체경영성건설용지사용권류전미득도일반성승인；“소산권방”루금불절，행정、사법무능위력。집체경영성건설용지류전적제도장애，원우《헌법》제10조“성시토지속우국가소유”지규정급기체계효응。위료실현집체경영성건설용지“동등입시”적개혁목표，응재총결지방개혁시점경험적기출상실행법제혁신，포괄：명학“집체건설용지사용권”적용익물권지위；배제집체경영성건설용지（사용권）류전적헌법화법률장애；구건집체경영성건설용지사용권류전적규칙체계；완선집체경영성건설용지사용권류전적배투제도。
A series of problems in the transfer of collective operational construction land have been a focus of public concern. Right of use to collective operational construction land doesnot get legal recognition, the transfer of which also hasn＇ t been general admitted. Furthermore, ＂ small property house＂ blossom everywhere, with which government and judiciary have little help. The obstacle comes from article 10 of the Constitution, which stipulates that ＂urban land is owned by the state＂. In order to make the collective operational construction land flowing freely, there are several steps, which come from local experience, to follow： conforming to the status of collective operational construction land＇ s usufruct; removing the legal obstacles of transfer of collective operational construction land; and constructing the system of transfer; improving the relevant rules and regulations.