教育研究
教育研究
교육연구
Educational Research
2015年
8期
22~32
,共null页
个人教育收益 文凭效应 劳动力市场分剖 家庭资本
箇人教育收益 文憑效應 勞動力市場分剖 傢庭資本
개인교육수익 문빙효응 노동력시장분부 가정자본
personal education returns; diploma effects; labor market segmentation; family capital
用CGSS两年一次的中国综合社会调查数据,实证研究我国个人教育收益中的文凭效应。研究发现,我国个人教育收益中的文凭效应是显著的,专科、本科、硕士教育收益中的文凭效应分别为17.1%、51.9%、42.6%,本科最高;劳动力市场分剧影响着文凭效应的高低,女性、非公共部门、东部地区的文凭效应分别比男性、公共部门、西部地区的文凭效应要高,但中、西部地区间的文凭效应无明显差异;家庭资本给文凭效应带来影响,父母受过高等教育与没有受过高等教育相比,其子女的文凭效应要高,父母在党政机关工作反而会降低子女的文凭效应;最后,劳动力市场分剖与家庭资本交互作用下的文凭效应是不同的。
用CGSS兩年一次的中國綜閤社會調查數據,實證研究我國箇人教育收益中的文憑效應。研究髮現,我國箇人教育收益中的文憑效應是顯著的,專科、本科、碩士教育收益中的文憑效應分彆為17.1%、51.9%、42.6%,本科最高;勞動力市場分劇影響著文憑效應的高低,女性、非公共部門、東部地區的文憑效應分彆比男性、公共部門、西部地區的文憑效應要高,但中、西部地區間的文憑效應無明顯差異;傢庭資本給文憑效應帶來影響,父母受過高等教育與沒有受過高等教育相比,其子女的文憑效應要高,父母在黨政機關工作反而會降低子女的文憑效應;最後,勞動力市場分剖與傢庭資本交互作用下的文憑效應是不同的。
용CGSS량년일차적중국종합사회조사수거,실증연구아국개인교육수익중적문빙효응。연구발현,아국개인교육수익중적문빙효응시현저적,전과、본과、석사교육수익중적문빙효응분별위17.1%、51.9%、42.6%,본과최고;노동력시장분극영향착문빙효응적고저,녀성、비공공부문、동부지구적문빙효응분별비남성、공공부문、서부지구적문빙효응요고,단중、서부지구간적문빙효응무명현차이;가정자본급문빙효응대래영향,부모수과고등교육여몰유수과고등교육상비,기자녀적문빙효응요고,부모재당정궤관공작반이회강저자녀적문빙효응;최후,노동력시장분부여가정자본교호작용하적문빙효응시불동적。
The biennial CGSS data was used to study the diploma effects in the personal education returns in China empirically. It is found that, diploma effects in China are significant, and the effects of undergraduate education hit the highest (51.9%), comparing to 3-year college education (17.1%) and master education (42.6%). Then, the effects are influenced by labor market segmentation. To be specific, the diploma effects of women are higher than men, that of non-public sectors are higher than public sectors, that of eastern region are higher than the western region, but there are no distinct differences of diploma effects between the central and western regions. Moreover, family capital exerts influence on diploma effects, consequentially those whose parents received higher education take on higher diploma effects than those whose parents didn't receive higher education; however, those who engaged in government offices might lower the diploma effects of their next generation. By and large, diploma effects don't constantly remain the same under the interaction between labor market segmentation and family capital.