CAJ | 학술논문

打击错误的本质问题是因果偏离与故意归责的实现问题。法定符合说将故意抽象化，用抽象的反对动机实现故意归责，混淆了过失行为危险与故意行为危险，忽视了因果偏离的重要性，面临违法阻却事由也存在适用障碍，会不当扩大结果加重犯的范围，也无法绕开未遂犯故意的具体判断。从构成要件的呼吁警示机能与责任的关系出发，反对动机应具有具体内容，构成要件故意应作具体化理解。具体符合说在判断符合性时，宜遵循“危险设定一具体对象”的具体分析法，依此可以合理回应所受质疑，也可以妥当划分对象错误与打击错误的界限，也即行为人危险设定的对象是否存在错误。
타격착오적본질문제시인과편리여고의귀책적실현문제。법정부합설장고의추상화，용추상적반대동궤실현고의귀책，혼효료과실행위위험여고의행위위험，홀시료인과편리적중요성，면림위법조각사유야존재괄용장애，회불당확대결과가중범적범위，야무법요개미수범고의적구체판단。종구성요건적호우경시궤능여책임적관계출발，반대동궤응구유구체내용，구성요건고의응작구체화리해。구체부합설재판단부합성시，의준순“위험설정일구체대상”적구체분석법，의차가이합리회응소수질의，야가이타당화분대상착오여타격착오적계한，야즉행위인위험설정적대상시부존재착오。
The essential issue of attack error is the problem of causation error and actualizing the im- puted intent. The theory of the legal according doctrine abstracts the intent and applies the abstract oppo- sing intent to actualize imputed intent, confuses the danger of the negligent act and the danger of the in- tentional act, ignores the importance of causation error, causes the hindrance in elimination illegality, the scope of aggravated offense would be improperly expanded and the specific judgment on the intent of un- accomplished crime cannot by bypassed. Regarding the relationship between the appeal warning function of constitutive requirements and responsibility, opposing intent should have concrete content, and consti- tutive requirements of intent should be understood specifically. When judging the conformance, the theo- ry of idiographic according doctrine should accord with the specific analysis of the ＂Setting danger →Idio- graphic object＂, thus responding reasonably to doubts, properly distinguishing object error and attack er- ror, namely, to distinguish whether the object which the doer attempted to threaten is an error or not.