四川医学
四川醫學
사천의학
Sichuan Medical Journal
2015年
8期
1092-1094
,共3页
艾民%颜昌福%贺剑%夏福纯%周双陆%李翠萍
艾民%顏昌福%賀劍%夏福純%週雙陸%李翠萍
애민%안창복%하검%하복순%주쌍륙%리취평
右心室%心尖部起搏%流出道起搏
右心室%心尖部起搏%流齣道起搏
우심실%심첨부기박%류출도기박
right ventricle%apex pacing%outflow tract pacing
目的 探讨右心室流出道部位起搏对患者左心室功能变化的影响. 方法 选择符合起搏器植入指征患者48例,按照右心室不同起搏部位分为右室心尖部起搏组( RVAP)及右室流出道部起搏组( RVOT) ,观察两组患者起搏器植入术前及术后12个月血浆BNP水平、心电图QRS波时限、左室收缩末期内径( LVEDV)、左室舒张末期内径( LVESV)、左室射血分数(LVEF)等指标. 结果 RVAP组患者术后12个月血浆BNP水平(762 ± 19)pg/mL明显高于术前(561 ± 15) pg/mL(P<0. 05), RVOT组患者血浆BNP水平术前(539 ± 13)pg/mL与术后(612 ± 17)pg/mL比较差异无统计学意义(P>0. 05);术后RVAP组患者心电图QRS时限最宽(P<0. 05),RVOT组患者最窄(P<0. 05);术后RVAP与RVOT组患者左心室收缩末期前后径、舒张末期前后径、射血分数与术前比较差异均无统计学意义( P>0. 05 ). 结论 选择右心室流出道部位起搏,患者血浆BNP水平最低、起搏QRS时限最窄,可能是理想的右心室起搏部位.
目的 探討右心室流齣道部位起搏對患者左心室功能變化的影響. 方法 選擇符閤起搏器植入指徵患者48例,按照右心室不同起搏部位分為右室心尖部起搏組( RVAP)及右室流齣道部起搏組( RVOT) ,觀察兩組患者起搏器植入術前及術後12箇月血漿BNP水平、心電圖QRS波時限、左室收縮末期內徑( LVEDV)、左室舒張末期內徑( LVESV)、左室射血分數(LVEF)等指標. 結果 RVAP組患者術後12箇月血漿BNP水平(762 ± 19)pg/mL明顯高于術前(561 ± 15) pg/mL(P<0. 05), RVOT組患者血漿BNP水平術前(539 ± 13)pg/mL與術後(612 ± 17)pg/mL比較差異無統計學意義(P>0. 05);術後RVAP組患者心電圖QRS時限最寬(P<0. 05),RVOT組患者最窄(P<0. 05);術後RVAP與RVOT組患者左心室收縮末期前後徑、舒張末期前後徑、射血分數與術前比較差異均無統計學意義( P>0. 05 ). 結論 選擇右心室流齣道部位起搏,患者血漿BNP水平最低、起搏QRS時限最窄,可能是理想的右心室起搏部位.
목적 탐토우심실류출도부위기박대환자좌심실공능변화적영향. 방법 선택부합기박기식입지정환자48례,안조우심실불동기박부위분위우실심첨부기박조( RVAP)급우실류출도부기박조( RVOT) ,관찰량조환자기박기식입술전급술후12개월혈장BNP수평、심전도QRS파시한、좌실수축말기내경( LVEDV)、좌실서장말기내경( LVESV)、좌실사혈분수(LVEF)등지표. 결과 RVAP조환자술후12개월혈장BNP수평(762 ± 19)pg/mL명현고우술전(561 ± 15) pg/mL(P<0. 05), RVOT조환자혈장BNP수평술전(539 ± 13)pg/mL여술후(612 ± 17)pg/mL비교차이무통계학의의(P>0. 05);술후RVAP조환자심전도QRS시한최관(P<0. 05),RVOT조환자최착(P<0. 05);술후RVAP여RVOT조환자좌심실수축말기전후경、서장말기전후경、사혈분수여술전비교차이균무통계학의의( P>0. 05 ). 결론 선택우심실류출도부위기박,환자혈장BNP수평최저、기박QRS시한최착,가능시이상적우심실기박부위.
Objective To evaluate the effect of outflow tract pacing of right ventricle on the left ventricular systolic func-tion by comparing. Methods 48 patients with implanted DDD or VVI pacemaker,in accordance with the right ventrieular different pacing sites were randomly divided into two groups:right ventricular apex pacing( RVAP) and right ventricular outflow tract pacing ( RVOT) . Plasma BNP, QRS wave duration,left ventricular end systolic diameter ( LVESV) , left ventricular end diastolic diame-ter( LVEDV) ,left ventricular ejection fraction( LVEF) were recorded and compared before and 12 months after pacemaker implan-tation. Results Plasma BNP levels were increased in RVAP compared before and 18 months after pacemaker implantation ( P<0. 05). There is no statistical difference in RVOT(P>0. 05). Among the two groups,the QRS wave duration was the most widest in RVAP,while the QRS wave duration was the narrowest in RVOT group(P<0. 05). The LVEDV, LVESV, LVEF were no chan-ges in RVSP or RVOT groups(P>0. 05). Conclusion The QRS wave duration was narrow and the plasma BNP was lower for the right ventfieular outflow tract pacing. May be the pacing site ideal for patients.