地震地磁观测与研究
地震地磁觀測與研究
지진지자관측여연구
Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research
2015年
4期
76-81
,共6页
冯建琴%张仰辉%程冬焱%张正霞%沈晓松%李艳%李军%段跃荣
馮建琴%張仰輝%程鼕焱%張正霞%瀋曉鬆%李豔%李軍%段躍榮
풍건금%장앙휘%정동염%장정하%침효송%리염%리군%단약영
倾斜仪%应变仪%速率变化%谱分析%小波细节%同步性
傾斜儀%應變儀%速率變化%譜分析%小波細節%同步性
경사의%응변의%속솔변화%보분석%소파세절%동보성
inclinometer%strain gauge%rate%spectrum analysis%wavelet detail%synchronization
分析2014年2月12日新疆于田7.3级地震前山西地区倾斜仪、应变仪资料,发现侯马地震台水管仪、伸缩仪及临汾、太原、离石地震台水平摆不同程度地发生转向、速率变化.经对同时段观测资料差分分析得知,震前1—9天日均值差分值超出2倍中误差;谱分析表明,震前10天,在0.000 37—0.000 43 Hz、0.000 76—0.000 87 Hz频段,观测到大幅值异常信息;小波细节分析说明,多种形变仪器在64—128小时时段内观测到长周期低频率异常信号;震前20天体应变加卸载响应比大幅偏离正常值现象,恢复正常后发震.各测向在异常的起始时间有较好的准同步性.
分析2014年2月12日新疆于田7.3級地震前山西地區傾斜儀、應變儀資料,髮現侯馬地震檯水管儀、伸縮儀及臨汾、太原、離石地震檯水平襬不同程度地髮生轉嚮、速率變化.經對同時段觀測資料差分分析得知,震前1—9天日均值差分值超齣2倍中誤差;譜分析錶明,震前10天,在0.000 37—0.000 43 Hz、0.000 76—0.000 87 Hz頻段,觀測到大幅值異常信息;小波細節分析說明,多種形變儀器在64—128小時時段內觀測到長週期低頻率異常信號;震前20天體應變加卸載響應比大幅偏離正常值現象,恢複正常後髮震.各測嚮在異常的起始時間有較好的準同步性.
분석2014년2월12일신강우전7.3급지진전산서지구경사의、응변의자료,발현후마지진태수관의、신축의급림분、태원、리석지진태수평파불동정도지발생전향、속솔변화.경대동시단관측자료차분분석득지,진전1—9천일균치차분치초출2배중오차;보분석표명,진전10천,재0.000 37—0.000 43 Hz、0.000 76—0.000 87 Hz빈단,관측도대폭치이상신식;소파세절분석설명,다충형변의기재64—128소시시단내관측도장주기저빈솔이상신호;진전20천체응변가사재향응비대폭편리정상치현상,회복정상후발진.각측향재이상적기시시간유교호적준동보성.
Analyzed the tiltmeterand strain gauge data in Shanxi area before the Feb.12,2014 Xinjiang Yutian M 7.3 earthquake. It is found that the different degree water pipe instrument and extensometer at Houma Seismic Station&Linfen,Taiyuanand Lishi seismic stations level shift are occur the rate of change. By analysis of the time difference of observation data, it is found that 1 - 9 days before the earthquake, the mean difference value is beyond the error 2 times. The spectrum analysis shows that, 10 days before the earthquake, in 0.000 37 - 0.000 43 Hz,0.000 76 - 0.000 87 Hz band, the observed amplitude anomaly occurred. The wavelet detail analysis indicates that a variety of deformation instrument in 64 - 128 hours observed in long cycle low frequency anomaly occurred before the earthquake signal. 20 celestial strain load unload response ratio significantly deviate from the normal phenomenon, returned to normal after the earthquake. The different components are with good quasi synchronicity at the starting time of anomaly.