四川医学
四川醫學
사천의학
Sichuan Medical Journal
2015年
9期
1283-1286
,共4页
吴红卫%李书武%胡丹%兰敏
吳紅衛%李書武%鬍丹%蘭敏
오홍위%리서무%호단%란민
伊马替尼%干扰素-α2b%分子学反应%慢性髓性白血病
伊馬替尼%榦擾素-α2b%分子學反應%慢性髓性白血病
이마체니%간우소-α2b%분자학반응%만성수성백혈병
imatinib%interferon-α2b%molecular response%chronic myeloid leukemia
目的:探讨伊马替尼联合干扰素α2b( INF-α2b)治疗慢性粒细胞白血病( CML)的临床疗效及安全性。方法选择73例新诊断CML慢性期患者,随机分组,分别给予伊马替尼400mg/d(n=30),伊马替尼400mg/d和INF-α2b 300万U隔日一次(n=43)。观察两组患者不同时间的主要分子学反应(MMR)、完全细胞学反应(CCyR)和完全分子学反应( CMR),并比较两组患者总体生存( OS)、无进展生存( PFS)差异以及不良反应。结果联合组CCyR在用药6个月时高于伊马替尼组(60.5% vs.36.7%,P<0.05),12个月时差异消失。联合组MMR+CMR在用药6个月及12个月时均高于伊马替尼组(74.4% vs.43.3%,76.7% vs.46.7%,P<0.05),在24个月时两组之间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。联合组血液学不良反应发生率高于伊马替尼组(P<0.05),而非血液学不良反应率却与伊马替尼组差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。24个月观察期内,两组患者OS率(u=0.458,P=0.504)、PFS率(u=0.598,P=0.423)差异无统计学意义。结论伊马替尼联合INF-α2b可以使CML患者更快获得遗传学及分子学反应,但并不能改善患者在用药24个月内的生存率,而且可能增加血液学不良反应发生率。
目的:探討伊馬替尼聯閤榦擾素α2b( INF-α2b)治療慢性粒細胞白血病( CML)的臨床療效及安全性。方法選擇73例新診斷CML慢性期患者,隨機分組,分彆給予伊馬替尼400mg/d(n=30),伊馬替尼400mg/d和INF-α2b 300萬U隔日一次(n=43)。觀察兩組患者不同時間的主要分子學反應(MMR)、完全細胞學反應(CCyR)和完全分子學反應( CMR),併比較兩組患者總體生存( OS)、無進展生存( PFS)差異以及不良反應。結果聯閤組CCyR在用藥6箇月時高于伊馬替尼組(60.5% vs.36.7%,P<0.05),12箇月時差異消失。聯閤組MMR+CMR在用藥6箇月及12箇月時均高于伊馬替尼組(74.4% vs.43.3%,76.7% vs.46.7%,P<0.05),在24箇月時兩組之間差異無統計學意義(P>0.05)。聯閤組血液學不良反應髮生率高于伊馬替尼組(P<0.05),而非血液學不良反應率卻與伊馬替尼組差異無統計學意義(P >0.05)。24箇月觀察期內,兩組患者OS率(u=0.458,P=0.504)、PFS率(u=0.598,P=0.423)差異無統計學意義。結論伊馬替尼聯閤INF-α2b可以使CML患者更快穫得遺傳學及分子學反應,但併不能改善患者在用藥24箇月內的生存率,而且可能增加血液學不良反應髮生率。
목적:탐토이마체니연합간우소α2b( INF-α2b)치료만성립세포백혈병( CML)적림상료효급안전성。방법선택73례신진단CML만성기환자,수궤분조,분별급여이마체니400mg/d(n=30),이마체니400mg/d화INF-α2b 300만U격일일차(n=43)。관찰량조환자불동시간적주요분자학반응(MMR)、완전세포학반응(CCyR)화완전분자학반응( CMR),병비교량조환자총체생존( OS)、무진전생존( PFS)차이이급불량반응。결과연합조CCyR재용약6개월시고우이마체니조(60.5% vs.36.7%,P<0.05),12개월시차이소실。연합조MMR+CMR재용약6개월급12개월시균고우이마체니조(74.4% vs.43.3%,76.7% vs.46.7%,P<0.05),재24개월시량조지간차이무통계학의의(P>0.05)。연합조혈액학불량반응발생솔고우이마체니조(P<0.05),이비혈액학불량반응솔각여이마체니조차이무통계학의의(P >0.05)。24개월관찰기내,량조환자OS솔(u=0.458,P=0.504)、PFS솔(u=0.598,P=0.423)차이무통계학의의。결론이마체니연합INF-α2b가이사CML환자경쾌획득유전학급분자학반응,단병불능개선환자재용약24개월내적생존솔,이차가능증가혈액학불량반응발생솔。
Objective To investigate the clinical value of imatinib plus IFN-α2b in chronic myeloid leukemia(CML). Methods We randomly assigned 73 newly diagnosed CP-CML patients to receive imatinib 400mg/d(n=30)alone, imatainib 400mg/d plus IFN--α2b million IU every other day(n=43). Molecular and cytogenetic responses, overall, progression-free sur-vival and adverse events were assessed. Results A higher rate of CCyR at 6 months occurred with imatinib plus IFN-α2b than with imatinib 400 mg/d(60. 5% vs. 36. 7%,P<0. 05), but no difference was observed lateron. The rate of MMR+CMR was significantly higher among patients received imatinib and IFN-α2b thanthe patients received 400 mg of imatinib alone(74. 4% vs. 43. 3%,76. 7% vs. 46. 7%,P<0. 05)at 6 and 12 months, but not form 24 mouths on. There was no significant difference of OS (u=0. 458,P=0. 504)or PFS(u=0. 598,P=0. 423). There were more patients with hematologic adverse events in the imatinib plus IFN-α2b combination therapy arm than in the imtinibmonotherapy arm(P<0. 05), but the rate of nonhematologic adverse e-vents was no difference. Conclusion As compared with other threatments, the addition of IFN-α2b to imatinib resulted in higher rates ofcytogenetic response and molecular response in patients with CP-CML, but it cannot influence the long-term overall and pro-gression free survival.