中国急救医学
中國急救醫學
중국급구의학
Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine
2015年
9期
823-826
,共4页
张玉国%孙巧%王界成%李玉华
張玉國%孫巧%王界成%李玉華
장옥국%손교%왕계성%리옥화
β1-受体阻滞剂%脑卒中%尿路感染%肺炎%死亡
β1-受體阻滯劑%腦卒中%尿路感染%肺炎%死亡
β1-수체조체제%뇌졸중%뇨로감염%폐염%사망
β1 -blocker%Stroke%Urinary tract infections%Pneumonia%Death
目的:探讨β1-受体阻滞剂治疗脑卒中后对患者感染和死亡率的影响。方法本研究是前瞻性队列研究,将2012-01~2014-06在我院神经内科接受治疗的125例急性脑卒中患者纳入研究,根据患者是否服用β1-受体阻滞剂将患者分为β1-受体阻滞剂组60例(治疗组)与无β1-受体阻滞剂组65例(对照组),使用流式细胞仪检测患者iNKT细胞值,利用多变量Poisson过程和Cox回归模型分析β1-受体阻滞剂治疗对脑卒中后肺炎、尿路感染和死亡率的影响。结果110例(88.3%)患者是缺血性脑卒中,15例(11.7%)患者是出血性脑卒中。神经功能缺损评分(NIHSS)基线值为8分(5~16分)。60例(48.2%)患者接受β1-受体阻滞剂治疗。β1-受体阻滞剂治疗对脑卒中后患者肺炎的发生没有影响,差异无统计学意义( RR=1.00,95%CI 0.77~1.30,P=0.995)。而β1-受体阻滞剂治疗患者尿路感染的风险明显降低(RR=0.65,95%CI 0.43~0.98,P=0.040)。7 d死亡率差异无统计学意义(RR=1.36,95%CI 0.65~2.77, P=0.425),而β1-受体阻滞剂治疗患者30 d死亡率较高( HR=1.93,95% CI 1.20~3.10, P=0.006)。治疗组肺炎患者亚组与尿路感染亚组患者iNKT细胞值的组内差异无统计学意义,组间比较尿路感染亚组的iNKT细胞较低(P<0.05)。结论β1-受体阻滞剂治疗不能减少患者卒中后发生肺炎的危险,但能显著降低尿路感染的风险。
目的:探討β1-受體阻滯劑治療腦卒中後對患者感染和死亡率的影響。方法本研究是前瞻性隊列研究,將2012-01~2014-06在我院神經內科接受治療的125例急性腦卒中患者納入研究,根據患者是否服用β1-受體阻滯劑將患者分為β1-受體阻滯劑組60例(治療組)與無β1-受體阻滯劑組65例(對照組),使用流式細胞儀檢測患者iNKT細胞值,利用多變量Poisson過程和Cox迴歸模型分析β1-受體阻滯劑治療對腦卒中後肺炎、尿路感染和死亡率的影響。結果110例(88.3%)患者是缺血性腦卒中,15例(11.7%)患者是齣血性腦卒中。神經功能缺損評分(NIHSS)基線值為8分(5~16分)。60例(48.2%)患者接受β1-受體阻滯劑治療。β1-受體阻滯劑治療對腦卒中後患者肺炎的髮生沒有影響,差異無統計學意義( RR=1.00,95%CI 0.77~1.30,P=0.995)。而β1-受體阻滯劑治療患者尿路感染的風險明顯降低(RR=0.65,95%CI 0.43~0.98,P=0.040)。7 d死亡率差異無統計學意義(RR=1.36,95%CI 0.65~2.77, P=0.425),而β1-受體阻滯劑治療患者30 d死亡率較高( HR=1.93,95% CI 1.20~3.10, P=0.006)。治療組肺炎患者亞組與尿路感染亞組患者iNKT細胞值的組內差異無統計學意義,組間比較尿路感染亞組的iNKT細胞較低(P<0.05)。結論β1-受體阻滯劑治療不能減少患者卒中後髮生肺炎的危險,但能顯著降低尿路感染的風險。
목적:탐토β1-수체조체제치료뇌졸중후대환자감염화사망솔적영향。방법본연구시전첨성대렬연구,장2012-01~2014-06재아원신경내과접수치료적125례급성뇌졸중환자납입연구,근거환자시부복용β1-수체조체제장환자분위β1-수체조체제조60례(치료조)여무β1-수체조체제조65례(대조조),사용류식세포의검측환자iNKT세포치,이용다변량Poisson과정화Cox회귀모형분석β1-수체조체제치료대뇌졸중후폐염、뇨로감염화사망솔적영향。결과110례(88.3%)환자시결혈성뇌졸중,15례(11.7%)환자시출혈성뇌졸중。신경공능결손평분(NIHSS)기선치위8분(5~16분)。60례(48.2%)환자접수β1-수체조체제치료。β1-수체조체제치료대뇌졸중후환자폐염적발생몰유영향,차이무통계학의의( RR=1.00,95%CI 0.77~1.30,P=0.995)。이β1-수체조체제치료환자뇨로감염적풍험명현강저(RR=0.65,95%CI 0.43~0.98,P=0.040)。7 d사망솔차이무통계학의의(RR=1.36,95%CI 0.65~2.77, P=0.425),이β1-수체조체제치료환자30 d사망솔교고( HR=1.93,95% CI 1.20~3.10, P=0.006)。치료조폐염환자아조여뇨로감염아조환자iNKT세포치적조내차이무통계학의의,조간비교뇨로감염아조적iNKT세포교저(P<0.05)。결론β1-수체조체제치료불능감소환자졸중후발생폐염적위험,단능현저강저뇨로감염적풍험。
Objective To investigate the effect of β1 -blocker therapy on the risk of infections and death after stroke in human .Methods A total of 125 patients with ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke , admitted to our hospital stroke unit from 2012 January to 2014 June, were included in this historical cohort study .Subjects were divided into β1 -blocker group ( therapy group ) and no -β1 -Blocker ( control group ) .iNKT value was detected in patients by flow cytometry .The effect of β1 -blocker therapy on post -stroke pneumonia , urinary tract infections and death was investigated using multivariable Poisson and Cox regression models .Results One hundred and ten (88.3%) patients were admitted with ischemic stroke, the remaining 15 (11.7%) patients had a hemorrhagic stroke. Median baseline NIHSS was 8 ( 5 ~16 ) points.Sixty ( 48.2%) patients received beta -blocker therapy .There was no difference in the risk of post -stroke pneumonia between patients with and withoutβ1 -blocker therapy (RR=1.00, 95% CI 0.77 ~1.30, P=0.995).Patients with β1 -blocker therapy showed a decreased risk for urinary tract infections ( RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.43~0.98, P=0.040).7-days mortality did not differ between groups (HR =1.36, 95% CI 0.65 ~2.77, P=0.425), while patients with β1 -blocker therapy showed a higher 30 -days mortality (HR=1.93, 95%CI 1.20~3.10, P=0.006).There was no significant difference in iNKT values between the patients with pneumonia and urinary tract infection , and the iNKT value in the urinary tract infection group was significantly lower than the pneumonia group (P<0.05).Conclusion β1 -blocker therapy does not reduce the risk for post -stroke pneumonia , but significantly reduces the risk for urinary tract infections .