心理技术与应用
心理技術與應用
심리기술여응용
Psychology:Techniques and Applications
2015年
9期
24-28
,共5页
葛缨%向晋辉%刘清%张进辅
葛纓%嚮晉輝%劉清%張進輔
갈영%향진휘%류청%장진보
心理咨询从业人员%专业认同%信度%效度%问卷编制
心理咨詢從業人員%專業認同%信度%效度%問捲編製
심리자순종업인원%전업인동%신도%효도%문권편제
psychological consultation jobholder%professional identity%reliability%validity%development of questionnaire
目的：：编制心理咨询从业人员专业认同问卷并检验其信效度。方法：在前期访谈及专家评定的基础上,确定问卷初步维度,抽取820名来自医疗机构、教育机构与咨询机构的心理咨询从业人员进行施测。通过项目分析筛选题目,并分别进行了探索性因素分析(n＝300)和验证性因素分析(n＝520)以确定与检验问卷的内容与结构,并检验其信度。结果：心理咨询从业人员专业认同问卷分为内部认同与外部认同两个分问卷。经探索性因素分析,内部认同分问卷抽取专业素质、专业情感、专业行为、专业价值4个因素,共20个项目；外部认同分问卷抽取专业人员、专业岗位2个因素,共9个项目。两个分问卷的因素负荷在0.45~0.81之间,累积方差贡献率分别为56.89％和50.00％。验证性因素分析验证了问卷结构的有效性,两个分问卷的各拟合指数符合心理测量学要求(RMSEA<0.8, NFI>0.9, CFI>0.9, IFI>0.9)。两个分问卷的 Cronbachα系数分别为0.86和0.83,各维度的α系数均在0.75以上；两个分问卷的重测信度分别为0.89和0.82,各维度重测信度为0.71~0.79。结论：心理咨询从业人员专业认同问卷符合心理测量学要求,适用于心理咨询从业人员专业认同的相关研究。
目的：：編製心理咨詢從業人員專業認同問捲併檢驗其信效度。方法：在前期訪談及專傢評定的基礎上,確定問捲初步維度,抽取820名來自醫療機構、教育機構與咨詢機構的心理咨詢從業人員進行施測。通過項目分析篩選題目,併分彆進行瞭探索性因素分析(n＝300)和驗證性因素分析(n＝520)以確定與檢驗問捲的內容與結構,併檢驗其信度。結果：心理咨詢從業人員專業認同問捲分為內部認同與外部認同兩箇分問捲。經探索性因素分析,內部認同分問捲抽取專業素質、專業情感、專業行為、專業價值4箇因素,共20箇項目；外部認同分問捲抽取專業人員、專業崗位2箇因素,共9箇項目。兩箇分問捲的因素負荷在0.45~0.81之間,纍積方差貢獻率分彆為56.89％和50.00％。驗證性因素分析驗證瞭問捲結構的有效性,兩箇分問捲的各擬閤指數符閤心理測量學要求(RMSEA<0.8, NFI>0.9, CFI>0.9, IFI>0.9)。兩箇分問捲的 Cronbachα繫數分彆為0.86和0.83,各維度的α繫數均在0.75以上；兩箇分問捲的重測信度分彆為0.89和0.82,各維度重測信度為0.71~0.79。結論：心理咨詢從業人員專業認同問捲符閤心理測量學要求,適用于心理咨詢從業人員專業認同的相關研究。
목적：：편제심리자순종업인원전업인동문권병검험기신효도。방법：재전기방담급전가평정적기출상,학정문권초보유도,추취820명래자의료궤구、교육궤구여자순궤구적심리자순종업인원진행시측。통과항목분석사선제목,병분별진행료탐색성인소분석(n＝300)화험증성인소분석(n＝520)이학정여검험문권적내용여결구,병검험기신도。결과：심리자순종업인원전업인동문권분위내부인동여외부인동량개분문권。경탐색성인소분석,내부인동분문권추취전업소질、전업정감、전업행위、전업개치4개인소,공20개항목；외부인동분문권추취전업인원、전업강위2개인소,공9개항목。량개분문권적인소부하재0.45~0.81지간,루적방차공헌솔분별위56.89％화50.00％。험증성인소분석험증료문권결구적유효성,량개분문권적각의합지수부합심리측량학요구(RMSEA<0.8, NFI>0.9, CFI>0.9, IFI>0.9)。량개분문권적 Cronbachα계수분별위0.86화0.83,각유도적α계수균재0.75이상；량개분문권적중측신도분별위0.89화0.82,각유도중측신도위0.71~0.79。결론：심리자순종업인원전업인동문권부합심리측량학요구,괄용우심리자순종업인원전업인동적상관연구。
Objectives: To develop the Professional Identity Questionnaire for Psychological Consultation Jobholders (PIQ-PCJ), and examine its reliability and validity. Methods: Initial dimensions of the questionnaire were determined on the basis of literature review, previous interview and expert’s evaluation. Totally 820 psychological consultation jobholders were recruited from medical institutions, ed-ucational institutions and consulting institutions. Through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analy-sis (CFA), the content and structure of the questionnaire were confirmed and tested. Psychometric properties including internal consis-tency (Cronbach’s alpha), test-retest reliability, content validity and construct validity were analyzed. Results: PIQ-PCJ consists of two sub-questionnaires, including internal identity and external identity. In the first sub-questionnaire, 4 factors, totally 20 items, were ex-tracted by EFA, which were “professional quality”, “professional emotion”, “professional behavior” and “professional value”. The second sub-questionnaire was divided into two factors (9 items) of “professional personnel” and “professional post” by EFA. The load-ing of items in both sub-questionnaires were ranged from 0. 45~0. 81. The factors in both sub-questionnaires could explain 56. 89% and 50. 00% of the total variance. The indicators of CFA with both sub-questionnaires were in requirements of psychometric (RMSEA<0. 8, NFI>0. 9, CFI>0. 9, IFI>0. 9). The Cronbach α coefficients of both sub-questionnaires were 0. 86 and 0. 83 respectively, and those of the various dimensions were all above 0. 75. The test-retest reliability of both sub-questionnaires were 0. 89 and 0. 82 severally, those of the various dimensions were 0. 71~0. 79. Conclusion: It suggests that Professional Identity Questionnaire for Psychological Consultation Jobholders (PIQ-PCJ) has good reliability and validity, and could be effectively applicable to the study of professional identity in psy-chological consultation jobholders.
