CAJ | 학술논문

针对“法国比较文学学派不属于核心比较文学学派，更称不上正宗的比较文学派”的观点，通过梳理世界比较文学发展历程，回溯法国学派和美国学派产生背景，证明法国学派和美国学派是比较文学历史发展过程中的两个阶段；而法国的实证方法与美国审美方法是比较文学研究互为补充的两个方面；当今比较文学再次面临新的危机的时候，强调法国学派的科学、严谨的精神尤为重要。
침대“법국비교문학학파불속우핵심비교문학학파，경칭불상정종적비교문학파”적관점，통과소리세계비교문학발전역정，회소법국학파화미국학파산생배경，증명법국학파화미국학파시비교문학역사발전과정중적량개계단；이법국적실증방법여미국심미방법시비교문학연구호위보충적량개방면；당금비교문학재차면림신적위궤적시후，강조법국학파적과학、엄근적정신우위중요。
Confronting the claim that“ the French School is neither one of the key comparative literary schools nor one of the authentic ones,” the present paper tackles the Comparative Literary history, to delve into the origin for both the French School and the American School, only to find that both of them are two indispensable periods in a continuum of Comparative Literary history, providing approaches necessary to Comparative Literature, and that the value of the former, being long neglected, should be reemphasized -especially nowadays when the Comparative Literature is one more on the verge of a new challenge.