南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版)
南京林業大學學報(人文社會科學版)
남경임업대학학보(인문사회과학판)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
2期
27-42
,共16页
环境伦理%自然原理%权责对等原理%环境利益最大化再生原则%环境利益平等共享原则
環境倫理%自然原理%權責對等原理%環境利益最大化再生原則%環境利益平等共享原則
배경윤리%자연원리%권책대등원리%배경이익최대화재생원칙%배경이익평등공향원칙
environmental ethics%the law of nature%the principle of reciprocity of power and responsibility%the regeneration principle of maximum environment interests%the principle of equally sharing of environment interests
环境伦理学的诞生和发展一直是以论争的方式展开:人类中心论与非人类中心论之争虽然催生出许多新观念和新理论,但都属于外部性探讨,因而使之陷入当前的“高原”困境。这种困境形成的根本原因有二:一是有意或无意割裂、抛弃伦理学传统,使之无本;二是忽视原理的探讨和构建,使之无根。要真突围这一“高原”困境,必须重新定位环境伦理学的自身性质、内涵及其属性,并在此基础上着力解决“环境道德的基础何在”和“环境道德的边界何在”这两个根本问题,重新续接人类已有的伦理传统,构建环境伦理的自然原理和实践规范原则体系。具体来讲,环境伦理学必须突破人类中心论的虚妄认知,重新发现原本就存在的自然原理即宇宙律令、自然法则、生命原理,它为重新释放人类伦理传统的当代光辉奠定了本体性基石,提供了认知和方法动力。人类伦理传统即人性原理,它以生命原理为基础,以宇宙律令为指南,以自然法则为源泉,展开为道德作为或美德追求。从本质上讲,美德是求义的,所以美德追求必须遵守舍利执爱原理,其激励原则是无私奉献和自我牺牲;而道德是求利的,所以道德作为必须遵守权责对等原理,它统摄四条环境伦理法则,即环境与人共生的关联法则、环境与人相向敞开的价值生成法则、人顺性适应环境的生存法则和人向环境取予的平等成本支付法则。以此四条环境伦理法则为规范,人们在走向环境生境重建的进程中,必须做到凡事利己不损它或利己亦利它。
環境倫理學的誕生和髮展一直是以論爭的方式展開:人類中心論與非人類中心論之爭雖然催生齣許多新觀唸和新理論,但都屬于外部性探討,因而使之陷入噹前的“高原”睏境。這種睏境形成的根本原因有二:一是有意或無意割裂、拋棄倫理學傳統,使之無本;二是忽視原理的探討和構建,使之無根。要真突圍這一“高原”睏境,必鬚重新定位環境倫理學的自身性質、內涵及其屬性,併在此基礎上著力解決“環境道德的基礎何在”和“環境道德的邊界何在”這兩箇根本問題,重新續接人類已有的倫理傳統,構建環境倫理的自然原理和實踐規範原則體繫。具體來講,環境倫理學必鬚突破人類中心論的虛妄認知,重新髮現原本就存在的自然原理即宇宙律令、自然法則、生命原理,它為重新釋放人類倫理傳統的噹代光輝奠定瞭本體性基石,提供瞭認知和方法動力。人類倫理傳統即人性原理,它以生命原理為基礎,以宇宙律令為指南,以自然法則為源泉,展開為道德作為或美德追求。從本質上講,美德是求義的,所以美德追求必鬚遵守捨利執愛原理,其激勵原則是無私奉獻和自我犧牲;而道德是求利的,所以道德作為必鬚遵守權責對等原理,它統攝四條環境倫理法則,即環境與人共生的關聯法則、環境與人相嚮敞開的價值生成法則、人順性適應環境的生存法則和人嚮環境取予的平等成本支付法則。以此四條環境倫理法則為規範,人們在走嚮環境生境重建的進程中,必鬚做到凡事利己不損它或利己亦利它。
배경윤리학적탄생화발전일직시이논쟁적방식전개:인류중심론여비인류중심론지쟁수연최생출허다신관념화신이론,단도속우외부성탐토,인이사지함입당전적“고원”곤경。저충곤경형성적근본원인유이:일시유의혹무의할렬、포기윤리학전통,사지무본;이시홀시원리적탐토화구건,사지무근。요진돌위저일“고원”곤경,필수중신정위배경윤리학적자신성질、내함급기속성,병재차기출상착력해결“배경도덕적기출하재”화“배경도덕적변계하재”저량개근본문제,중신속접인류이유적윤리전통,구건배경윤리적자연원리화실천규범원칙체계。구체래강,배경윤리학필수돌파인류중심론적허망인지,중신발현원본취존재적자연원리즉우주율령、자연법칙、생명원리,타위중신석방인류윤리전통적당대광휘전정료본체성기석,제공료인지화방법동력。인류윤리전통즉인성원리,타이생명원리위기출,이우주율령위지남,이자연법칙위원천,전개위도덕작위혹미덕추구。종본질상강,미덕시구의적,소이미덕추구필수준수사리집애원리,기격려원칙시무사봉헌화자아희생;이도덕시구리적,소이도덕작위필수준수권책대등원리,타통섭사조배경윤리법칙,즉배경여인공생적관련법칙、배경여인상향창개적개치생성법칙、인순성괄응배경적생존법칙화인향배경취여적평등성본지부법칙。이차사조배경윤리법칙위규범,인문재주향배경생경중건적진정중,필수주도범사이기불손타혹이기역리타。
Environmental ethics has emerged and developed with controversy. Although giving rise to many new ideas and theories, the debate between anthropocentrism and non?anthropocentrism, the external discussion, has put environmental ethics in the current“plateau”dilemma. This dilemma results from two aspects. First, the tradition of ethics has been intentionally or unintentionally split and abandoned, and so it has lost its basis. Second, the study and construction of principles have been neglected, and so it has been rootless. To break through the“plateau”dilemma, the nature, connotation and properties of the environmental ethics should be redefined. On this basis, two fundamental questions,“where the foundation of environmental ethics is laid”and“where the boundary of environmental ethics lies”, should be answered to continue the existed ethics tradition, and construct the natural principle and practical norms of environmental ethics. Specifically, the false cognition of anthropocentrism should be abandoned and some natural principles should be rediscovered, namely the cosmic laws, the natural law, and the principle of life, which lays the ontological foundation for ethical tradition to release the contemporary glory and provides power in cognition and approach. Human ethical tradition refers to the principle of human nature, which takes the principle of life as the basis, the cosmic law as the orientation, and the law of nature as the origin, and presents itself as moral conduct and virtue pursuit. Essentially, virtue is based on justice, and so we must abide by the principle of upholding?love?instead?of?interests while pursuing virtues, with selfless dedication and self sacrifice as the incentive; however, moral is based on interests, and so we must comply with the principle of reciprocity of power and responsibility when implementing moral conducts, which contains four environmental ethics rules,namely, the association rule of symbiosis of environment and human, value generation rule of the mutual opening between environment and human, survival rule of human’s accommodation with environment and the rule of equality between cost and payment in human??s exploitation of environment. With the four environmental ethics rules as the norm, people should benefit themselves and others as well; if not, people mustn ??t harm others when benefiting themselves in the process of reconstructing the environment and the habitat.