西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）
西南石油大學學報（社會科學版）
서남석유대학학보（사회과학판）
Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Social Sciences Edition)
2015年
5期
75-85
,共11页
组织行为%领导行为%共同犯罪%犯罪集团%黑社会性质组织
組織行為%領導行為%共同犯罪%犯罪集糰%黑社會性質組織
조직행위%령도행위%공동범죄%범죄집단%흑사회성질조직
leadership behavior%organizational behavior%joint crime%criminal group%organization in the nature of criminal syndicate
组织、领导行为作为我国刑法所规范涉罪行为类型中少有的集实行性与非实行性于一身的特殊行为样态，不仅关系着总则中特殊共犯类型主体的身份界定、刑事责任承担，更是决定着分则中具体个罪的犯罪构成，其丰富的内涵及复杂多变的存在状态须得到系统关注。通过对我国刑法分则452个罪名的整合梳理，在尚不涵盖评价聚众犯罪中首要分子行为手段的前提下，单以组织、领导特定行为为模式的成罪罪名即达十几项之多，基础行为概念已然不能满足对上述所规范组织、领导行为的认知，具体行为内涵应作更为清晰、深刻的区分阐释。组织、领导行为的独立归罪颠覆了其身居幕后的“传统”属性，因此立法的选择使我们必须尤为注意成罪的正当根据，即在把握入罪同异规律的同时考量国家阶段性刑事政策精神的变迁进程。实践中应正视双罚组织、领导行为入罪评价的必要性，合理丈量人权保障的基点，避免刑罚过剩。
組織、領導行為作為我國刑法所規範涉罪行為類型中少有的集實行性與非實行性于一身的特殊行為樣態，不僅關繫著總則中特殊共犯類型主體的身份界定、刑事責任承擔，更是決定著分則中具體箇罪的犯罪構成，其豐富的內涵及複雜多變的存在狀態鬚得到繫統關註。通過對我國刑法分則452箇罪名的整閤梳理，在尚不涵蓋評價聚衆犯罪中首要分子行為手段的前提下，單以組織、領導特定行為為模式的成罪罪名即達十幾項之多，基礎行為概唸已然不能滿足對上述所規範組織、領導行為的認知，具體行為內涵應作更為清晰、深刻的區分闡釋。組織、領導行為的獨立歸罪顛覆瞭其身居幕後的“傳統”屬性，因此立法的選擇使我們必鬚尤為註意成罪的正噹根據，即在把握入罪同異規律的同時攷量國傢階段性刑事政策精神的變遷進程。實踐中應正視雙罰組織、領導行為入罪評價的必要性，閤理丈量人權保障的基點，避免刑罰過剩。
조직、령도행위작위아국형법소규범섭죄행위류형중소유적집실행성여비실행성우일신적특수행위양태，불부관계착총칙중특수공범류형주체적신빈계정、형사책임승담，경시결정착분칙중구체개죄적범죄구성，기봉부적내함급복잡다변적존재상태수득도계통관주。통과대아국형법분칙452개죄명적정합소리，재상불함개평개취음범죄중수요분자행위수단적전제하，단이조직、령도특정행위위모식적성죄죄명즉체십궤항지다，기출행위개념이연불능만족대상술소규범조직、령도행위적인지，구체행위내함응작경위청석、심각적구분천석。조직、령도행위적독립귀죄전복료기신거막후적“전통”속성，인차입법적선택사아문필수우위주의성죄적정당근거，즉재파악입죄동이규률적동시고량국가계단성형사정책정신적변천진정。실천중응정시쌍벌조직、령도행위입죄평개적필요성，합리장량인권보장적기점，피면형벌과잉。
Leadership and organizational behavior,a special behavior type of offense types characteristic of both perpetrating act and non-perpetrating act according to the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China,not only influences identity definition and legal responsibility of the subject of the special types of accomplices in the general provision of Criminal Law,but determines the criminal constitution of specific crimes in the specific provisions of the Criminal Law. Therefore,it is necessary to give systematic attention to the complication of such behaviors. By combing through the 452 accusations in the Criminal Law,the author finds out dozens of accusations of various types of leadership and organizational behavior. The basic concept of criminal behaviors falls short in the determination of leadership and organizational behavior as there lacks a clearer definition of the connotation of specific behaviors. The conviction of leadership and organizational behaviors as specific crimes changes the traditional nature of such behaviors. Therefore,a sound legitimate basis is quite important in convicting such behaviors as we must also take national criminal policy into consideration. In practice,we must be careful in convicting leadership and organizational behaviors as separate crimes so as to avoid excessive punishment and protect the human rights.
