CAJ | 학술논문

依据已有的研究成果可知，在《禹贡》等文献所记“九州”名称具体化之前，“九州”的地域范围基本指的就是先秦文献所说的“有夏之居”，且“夏后”为“九州”的对音，由此可见，“禹画为九州”的传说应当略有一些较为可信的历史素材和依据，并非为周代人的凭空杜撰。再依据文献记载和田野考古资料进行考证得知，夏族早期活动中心位于河南嵩山南北，从而对姜亮夫先生早年阐发的“冀州即九州”说提出重大质疑。战国时期《禹贡》《周礼?职方氏》《吕氏春秋?有始》等文献中名称具体化的“九州”是以战国时期存在的几个大国、古国为基础，其和“禹画九州”的传说毫不相涉。关于“九州”的讨论，众多学者往往受前期研究的影响，先入为主进而得出结论，这种“走出疑古时代”错误理论误导下的盲目信古、复古，必然给中国古史研究造成一系列新的混乱，极不利于“禹画九州”传说之后诸多真实历史信息的科学揭发。
의거이유적연구성과가지，재《우공》등문헌소기“구주”명칭구체화지전，“구주”적지역범위기본지적취시선진문헌소설적“유하지거”，차“하후”위“구주”적대음，유차가견，“우화위구주”적전설응당략유일사교위가신적역사소재화의거，병비위주대인적빙공두찬。재의거문헌기재화전야고고자료진행고증득지，하족조기활동중심위우하남숭산남북，종이대강량부선생조년천발적“기주즉구주”설제출중대질의。전국시기《우공》《주례?직방씨》《려씨춘추?유시》등문헌중명칭구체화적“구주”시이전국시기존재적궤개대국、고국위기출，기화“우화구주”적전설호불상섭。관우“구주”적토론，음다학자왕왕수전기연구적영향，선입위주진이득출결론，저충“주출의고시대”착오이론오도하적맹목신고、복고，필연급중국고사연구조성일계렬신적혼란，겁불리우“우화구주”전설지후제다진실역사신식적과학게발。
According to the existing study achievements, in the literature such as Yu Gong, before the recorded name—nine states are specified, their regional range equals to the area of the Xia dynasty, after which nine states are called.Therefore, the legend that the Great Yu has divided the whole China into nine states should be credible, rather than fictional by the Zhou people.According to documentary recordings and archaeological data, the center place for the Xia people to act in the early time locates in the south and north of the Songshan Mountain, from which Mr.Jiang Liangfu’ s Jizhou being nine states should be doubted.In the Warring States period, in the literature such as Yu Gong, Zhou Li? Zhi Fang Shi, Lv Shi Chun Qiu? You Shi, nine states are definitely named on the basis of several large states or ancient states in the Warring States period, which is unrelated to the legend.On the discussion of nine states, many scholars are influenced by the studies in earlier stage and then come to the conclusion.This conclusion under“undoubted ancient times” blindly believes in the ancient data and tries to return to the ancients, which will make chaos to the Chinese ancient history study and go ill with the exposure of the true history information after the legend.