CAJ | 학술논문

目的：比较药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法在阴道加德纳菌鉴定中的应用效果。方法收集100例宫颈分泌物标本进行研究，分别利用药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法进行鉴定。观察记录两种方法的最终检测结果，并进行比较。结果100例标本均分别经药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法鉴定，最后的鉴定结果显示，药敏纸片扩散法一共鉴定出阴道加德纳菌36例，药敏纸片周围均出现明显的抑菌环。利用仪器法进行鉴定，同样鉴定出阴道加德纳菌36例。对2组的阴道加德纳菌鉴定结果进行比较，差异均无统计学意义（P＞0．05）。结论在对阴道加德纳菌进行鉴定，利用药敏纸片扩散法与仪器法的最终鉴定结果一致。但药敏纸片扩散法较之仪器法更加简单经济，实用性更强。
목적：비교약민지편확산법여의기법재음도가덕납균감정중적응용효과。방법수집100례궁경분비물표본진행연구，분별이용약민지편확산법여의기법진행감정。관찰기록량충방법적최종검측결과，병진행비교。결과100례표본균분별경약민지편확산법여의기법감정，최후적감정결과현시，약민지편확산법일공감정출음도가덕납균36례，약민지편주위균출현명현적억균배。이용의기법진행감정，동양감정출음도가덕납균36례。대2조적음도가덕납균감정결과진행비교，차이균무통계학의의（P＞0．05）。결론재대음도가덕납균진행감정，이용약민지편확산법여의기법적최종감정결과일치。단약민지편확산법교지의기법경가간단경제，실용성경강。
Objective To compare the application effect of disk diffusion method and the instrument method in the identification of Gardnerella vaginalis .Methods 100 samples of cervical secretion were collected and identified by the disk diffusion method and the instrument method .The final detection result of the two methods were observed and compared .Results The 100 specimens were respectively identified by the disk diffusion method and the instru‐ment method .The final identification results showed that 36 cases of Gardnerella vaginalis were identified by the disk diffusion method and there were obvious bacteriostatic ring around the drug sensitive paper .The same 36 cases of Gardnerella vaginalis were identified by the instrument method .The identification results had no statistical difference between the two kinds of method (P>0 .05) .Conclusion The disk diffusion method and instrument method have the same results for identifying Gardnerella vaginalis .But the disk diffusion method is more simple ,more economic and stronger in practicability than the instrument method .