检验医学与临床
檢驗醫學與臨床
검험의학여림상
Laboratory Medicine and Clinic
2015年
17期
2569-2570
,共2页
急性牙髓炎%一次性根充%长期疗效%分次根充
急性牙髓炎%一次性根充%長期療效%分次根充
급성아수염%일차성근충%장기료효%분차근충
acute pulpitis%single root canal filling%long term effect%split root filling
目的:比较在急性牙髓炎患者中采用一次性根充法与分次根充法治疗的长期效果。方法选取2011年9月至2012年9月该院口腔科收治的急性牙髓炎患者80例,按照随机数字分表法分成观察组与对照组,每组各40例,分别给予一次性根充法与分次根充法治疗,比较两组患者治疗1周后的疼痛情况及治疗2年后的临床疗效。结果观察组治疗1周后的疼痛评定优良率为10.00%,略高于对照组患者的8.00%,差异无统计学意义( P>0.05);观察组治疗2年后的成功率为94.00%,显著高于对照组患者的78.00%,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05)。结论采用一次性根充法治疗急性牙髓炎患者,比分次根充法的长期疗效更显著,操作简便,值得进一步推广。
目的:比較在急性牙髓炎患者中採用一次性根充法與分次根充法治療的長期效果。方法選取2011年9月至2012年9月該院口腔科收治的急性牙髓炎患者80例,按照隨機數字分錶法分成觀察組與對照組,每組各40例,分彆給予一次性根充法與分次根充法治療,比較兩組患者治療1週後的疼痛情況及治療2年後的臨床療效。結果觀察組治療1週後的疼痛評定優良率為10.00%,略高于對照組患者的8.00%,差異無統計學意義( P>0.05);觀察組治療2年後的成功率為94.00%,顯著高于對照組患者的78.00%,差異有統計學意義( P<0.05)。結論採用一次性根充法治療急性牙髓炎患者,比分次根充法的長期療效更顯著,操作簡便,值得進一步推廣。
목적:비교재급성아수염환자중채용일차성근충법여분차근충법치료적장기효과。방법선취2011년9월지2012년9월해원구강과수치적급성아수염환자80례,안조수궤수자분표법분성관찰조여대조조,매조각40례,분별급여일차성근충법여분차근충법치료,비교량조환자치료1주후적동통정황급치료2년후적림상료효。결과관찰조치료1주후적동통평정우량솔위10.00%,략고우대조조환자적8.00%,차이무통계학의의( P>0.05);관찰조치료2년후적성공솔위94.00%,현저고우대조조환자적78.00%,차이유통계학의의( P<0.05)。결론채용일차성근충법치료급성아수염환자,비분차근충법적장기료효경현저,조작간편,치득진일보추엄。
Objective To compare the long‐term effects of using one‐time root canal filling method and graded root canal filling method in treating acute pulpitis .Methods 80 cases of acute pulpitis in our hospital from September 2011 to September 2012 were selected and divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random digital table method ,40 cases in each group .The two groups were given the one‐time root canal filling meth‐od and the graded root canal filling method respectively .The pain situation after 1‐week treatment and the clinical effect in 2 years after treatment were compared between the two groups .Results The excellent and good rate of pain assessment after 1 weeks of treatment in the observation group was 10 .00% ,which was slightly higher than 8 .00%in the control group ,the difference had no statistical significance(P>0 .05);the success rate after 2 years of treat‐ment in the observation group was 94 .00% ,which was significantly higher than 78 .00% in the control group ,the difference was statistically significant(P<0 .05) .Conclusion Adopting one‐time root canal filling method for trea‐ting acute pulpitis has more significant long term effect than the graded root canal filling method ,which is easy to op‐erate and deserves to be further popularized .