中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
2015年
24期
2931-2933
,共3页
王爱红%朱洁%殷海燕%董玉静%孙景贤%徐桂华
王愛紅%硃潔%慇海燕%董玉靜%孫景賢%徐桂華
왕애홍%주길%은해연%동옥정%손경현%서계화
创新能力%学习积极主动性%相关性%本科护生
創新能力%學習積極主動性%相關性%本科護生
창신능력%학습적겁주동성%상관성%본과호생
Innovation ability%Learning proactivity%Correlation%Undergraduate nursing studene
目的:了解护生创新能力与学习积极主动性水平,探讨两者之间的关系,为提高和改善其创新能力提供理论依据。方法随机抽取我校2010—2013级护生260例,应用创新能力水平自我测试问卷评估护生创新能力,应用学习积极主动性量表评估护生学习积极主动性。结果护生创新能力得分为(63.04±10.99)分,学习积极主动性得分为(72.96±6.17)分;男护生在学习驱动力维度明显高于女护生(P<0.05);农村护生在学习积极主动性总分及其学习驱动力、学习目标维度明显高于城镇护生(P<0.05);创新能力水平高者学习积极主动性总分及其学习目标、控制学习、扎实学习维度明显高于创新能力低者。护生创新能力水平与学习积极主动性总分及学习目标、控制学习、扎实学习三个维度呈显著正相关(r值分别为0.272,0.153,0.243,0.398;P<0.05)。结论在教学工作中,应重视提高护生学习积极主动性,有效地提高护生创新能力。
目的:瞭解護生創新能力與學習積極主動性水平,探討兩者之間的關繫,為提高和改善其創新能力提供理論依據。方法隨機抽取我校2010—2013級護生260例,應用創新能力水平自我測試問捲評估護生創新能力,應用學習積極主動性量錶評估護生學習積極主動性。結果護生創新能力得分為(63.04±10.99)分,學習積極主動性得分為(72.96±6.17)分;男護生在學習驅動力維度明顯高于女護生(P<0.05);農村護生在學習積極主動性總分及其學習驅動力、學習目標維度明顯高于城鎮護生(P<0.05);創新能力水平高者學習積極主動性總分及其學習目標、控製學習、扎實學習維度明顯高于創新能力低者。護生創新能力水平與學習積極主動性總分及學習目標、控製學習、扎實學習三箇維度呈顯著正相關(r值分彆為0.272,0.153,0.243,0.398;P<0.05)。結論在教學工作中,應重視提高護生學習積極主動性,有效地提高護生創新能力。
목적:료해호생창신능력여학습적겁주동성수평,탐토량자지간적관계,위제고화개선기창신능력제공이론의거。방법수궤추취아교2010—2013급호생260례,응용창신능력수평자아측시문권평고호생창신능력,응용학습적겁주동성량표평고호생학습적겁주동성。결과호생창신능력득분위(63.04±10.99)분,학습적겁주동성득분위(72.96±6.17)분;남호생재학습구동력유도명현고우녀호생(P<0.05);농촌호생재학습적겁주동성총분급기학습구동력、학습목표유도명현고우성진호생(P<0.05);창신능력수평고자학습적겁주동성총분급기학습목표、공제학습、찰실학습유도명현고우창신능력저자。호생창신능력수평여학습적겁주동성총분급학습목표、공제학습、찰실학습삼개유도정현저정상관(r치분별위0.272,0.153,0.243,0.398;P<0.05)。결론재교학공작중,응중시제고호생학습적겁주동성,유효지제고호생창신능력。
Objective To investigate the level of innovation ability and learning proactivity in nursing students, and to analyze the correlation between them. Methods A total of 260 grade 2010—2013 nursing students were recruited in this study by random sampling method. They were investigated with the test of self innovation level scale and learning proactivity scale. Results The average score of innovation ability was (63. 04 ± 10. 99), and the average score of learning proactivity was (72. 96 ± 6. 17) in nursing students;the male nursing students in learning driving force dimension was significantly higher than that of the female nursing students (P<0. 05); the rural students in learning initiative and learning objective dimension score were significantly higher than those of urban students as well as learning driving force (P<0. 05). Students with high innovation had higher total learning initiative scores, learning goals, learning control and solid learning dimension than students with low innovation ability (P <0. 05). The innovation ability of nursing students had significantly positive correlation with learning initiative score and learning goals, learning control and solid learning three dimensions (r=0. 272,0. 153,0. 243,0. 398;P <0. 05). Conclusions It is suggested to pay attention to improving learning proactivity of nursing students, which contributes to innovation ability.