中国基层医药
中國基層醫藥
중국기층의약
Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
2015年
18期
2787-2789
,共3页
徐海飞%雷建明%章春来%张菁菁
徐海飛%雷建明%章春來%張菁菁
서해비%뢰건명%장춘래%장정정
超声弹性成像技术%前列腺癌%诊断
超聲彈性成像技術%前列腺癌%診斷
초성탄성성상기술%전렬선암%진단
Ultrasound elastography%Prostate cancer%Diagnosis
目的:评价超声弹性成像技术用于诊断前列腺癌的有效性与安全性。方法选取疑似前列腺癌患者83例,分别对其应用经直肠超声弹性成像(TRTE)和经直肠超声成像(TRUS)技术进行诊断。以患者的手术病理为诊断依据,比较两种方法的诊断效果。结果83例患者共有结节102个,其中有44例患者的的病理结果为良性,共49个结节;39例为恶性,共53个结节。102个结节中有47个为内腺结节,占46.08%;55个为外腺结节,占53.92%。共发现癌灶54个,TRTE 检出36个,检出率为66.67%,TRUS 仅检出24个,检出率为44.44%。TRTE 诊断的敏感性、特异性以及准确性分别为66.67%、68.65%与67.64%,均高于相应TRUS 诊断的44.44%、64.58%与53.92%,各项比较差异有统计学意义(χ2=10.710,P <0.05;χ2=3.879, P <0.05;χ2=4.084,P <0.05)。所选患者的良、恶性前列腺结节病理检查结果与 TRUE、TRUS 检查结果差异均无统计学意义(均 P >0.05)。结论将超声弹性成像技术用于诊断前列腺癌具有很好的敏感性、特异性以及准确性,可提高临床诊断效果,值得临床推广应用。
目的:評價超聲彈性成像技術用于診斷前列腺癌的有效性與安全性。方法選取疑似前列腺癌患者83例,分彆對其應用經直腸超聲彈性成像(TRTE)和經直腸超聲成像(TRUS)技術進行診斷。以患者的手術病理為診斷依據,比較兩種方法的診斷效果。結果83例患者共有結節102箇,其中有44例患者的的病理結果為良性,共49箇結節;39例為噁性,共53箇結節。102箇結節中有47箇為內腺結節,佔46.08%;55箇為外腺結節,佔53.92%。共髮現癌竈54箇,TRTE 檢齣36箇,檢齣率為66.67%,TRUS 僅檢齣24箇,檢齣率為44.44%。TRTE 診斷的敏感性、特異性以及準確性分彆為66.67%、68.65%與67.64%,均高于相應TRUS 診斷的44.44%、64.58%與53.92%,各項比較差異有統計學意義(χ2=10.710,P <0.05;χ2=3.879, P <0.05;χ2=4.084,P <0.05)。所選患者的良、噁性前列腺結節病理檢查結果與 TRUE、TRUS 檢查結果差異均無統計學意義(均 P >0.05)。結論將超聲彈性成像技術用于診斷前列腺癌具有很好的敏感性、特異性以及準確性,可提高臨床診斷效果,值得臨床推廣應用。
목적:평개초성탄성성상기술용우진단전렬선암적유효성여안전성。방법선취의사전렬선암환자83례,분별대기응용경직장초성탄성성상(TRTE)화경직장초성성상(TRUS)기술진행진단。이환자적수술병리위진단의거,비교량충방법적진단효과。결과83례환자공유결절102개,기중유44례환자적적병리결과위량성,공49개결절;39례위악성,공53개결절。102개결절중유47개위내선결절,점46.08%;55개위외선결절,점53.92%。공발현암조54개,TRTE 검출36개,검출솔위66.67%,TRUS 부검출24개,검출솔위44.44%。TRTE 진단적민감성、특이성이급준학성분별위66.67%、68.65%여67.64%,균고우상응TRUS 진단적44.44%、64.58%여53.92%,각항비교차이유통계학의의(χ2=10.710,P <0.05;χ2=3.879, P <0.05;χ2=4.084,P <0.05)。소선환자적량、악성전렬선결절병리검사결과여 TRUE、TRUS 검사결과차이균무통계학의의(균 P >0.05)。결론장초성탄성성상기술용우진단전렬선암구유흔호적민감성、특이성이급준학성,가제고림상진단효과,치득림상추엄응용。
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of pros-tate cancer.Methods 83 patients with prostate cancer were selected and diagnosed by transrectal ultrasound elastog-raphy (TRTE)and transrectal ultrasound(TRUS).The surgical pathology of the patients was used as diagnosis basis, and the efficacy of the two methods was evaluated.Results There were 102 nodules of all the 83 patients,44 patients'surgical pathology were benign,a total of 49 nodules,39 cases were vicious,a total of 53 nodules.47 nodules were gland nodules,accounting for 46.08% and 55 nodules were outer gland nodules,accounting for 53.92% of all the 102 nodules.There were 54 focis,the TRTE detected 36 focis,the detection rate was 66.67%,and TRUS detected 24 focis,the detection rate was 44.44%.The sensitivity,specificity and accuracy rates of TRTE were 66.67%, 68.65% and 67.64%,which were higher than 44.44%,64.58% and 53.92% of TRUS,and the differences were statistically significant (χ2 =10.710,P <0.05;χ2 =3.879,P <0.05;χ2 =4.084,P <0.05).The differences of pathological findings and TRTE,TRUS findings of the benign and malignant prostate nodules were not statistically significant (P >0.05 ).Conclusion It has higher diagnostic sensitivity,specificity and diagnostic accuracy for ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of prostate cancer,which can improve the clinical diagnostic performance and worthy of clinical application.